Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 21 road tests and 1 + 12,721 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 82–68

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2

g-Force Sport COMP-2

High Performance Summer tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 1 review

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,721 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)

“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 +19
    87
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 68 (est.)89
    Reviews found online6884

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 83.9 = 87

    No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 +18
    89
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 71 (est.)93
    Reviews found online7285

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 71

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 84.5 = 89

    No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 64

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 +12
    76
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 67 (est.)82
    Reviews found online6372

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 64

    Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 81.5 + 60% × 71.7 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests–73
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 67

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 +4
    71
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7078
    Reviews found online6360

    g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 62.8 = 67

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71

  6. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 +13
    81
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Pilot Sport 4
    Reviews found online6881
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Sport COMP-2Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests–76
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Relative Score 68 82
Dry 68 87
Wet 71 89
Comfort 64 76
Noise – 70
Treadwear 67 71
Handling (owners) 68 81
Efficiency – 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force Sport COMP-2

± 4

Pilot Sport 4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryg-Force Sport COMP-2Pilot Sport 4ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #20/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires #7/9 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Sport COMP-2

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Pilot Sport 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving

Cons

  • Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
  • Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.

team-bhp.com

“I ran the stock 17" Ecopia's on my Ecosport for about 45k km. Luckily didn't face any side wall cuts. Overall it was a average tyre with decent grip levels - good grip without any squealing when driving up a ghat road quite enthusiastically even at the fag end of it's life. Ride quality was pretty bad and the smallest of ruts would result in a thud and being low profile amplified it even more. The tyres developed these cracks along the shoulder around the 35-40k mark which should not have happened due to which I changed them at 45k even though there was probably enough thread for about 5-10k km more. Moved to the Michelin PS4 now and the difference is night and day!”

mbworld.org

“Quote: Originally Posted by ua549 In over 55 years of driving I've never gotten more than 20k miles on a set of tires. Michelin Pilot Sport is the worst at 6k miles twice in a row with free factory replacements though I've gotten 18k miles on Michelin AS3 tires once or twice. Dunlop Sport is second at 15k miles. Overall Pirelli Cinturato P7 are the longest wearing tires I've owned over the years at 20k miles consistently. I swap out run flat tires if they come on a new car. I believe that heat is a major cause of tire wear. Even after a 2 mile trip @ 35 mph the tires on my E300 register about 120°F. Cold they are between 80°F and 85°F. In the dead of winter they are 5° colder. The OEM tires on my 5 year old '18 E300 got 12k miles. The car has 20k miles on it now and the P7 tires are about 40% worn. My experience with Summer tires is 15 to 18k max. The only Summer tires that I have owned that lasted more than 20 were the Pilot Sport PS4...which BTW is one of their marketing highlights, longer tread wear...though still shorter than all seasons which normally are rated for 30k or more.”

r/CarTrackDays ·1 upvote ·2020-07-03

“The Pilot Sport 4's are great tires for dual duty use. You'll want to keep hot pressures below 37-38 PSI. Anything above that they get very greasy, very fast. In the cars I've driven with them (a few BMW M cars, a 911 I think if I remember), you'll usually set your best laps in the first 4-5 laps of a session depending on temps. Once they over heat heat, as with any street tire, you have to park them for an hour to get the temps down again (downside to steel radials). I'd also recommend Hankook RS4s if you want a more durable track tire. That's what I run. Very long lasting, but not as great in the wet as the PS4s would be. Road noise would also be an issue for street use.”

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires

Based on 246 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
CategoryHigh Performance Summer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—62
Rim diameters—16″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG340 AA A300 - 320 A - AA A
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 87 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 89 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 81 vs 68 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 64 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Pilot Sport 4?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 89 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 87 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Pilot Sport 4?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 71 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology