Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: g-Force Sport COMP-2 and Proxes RA1 are level at 69.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 79 |
g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 69
Proxes RA1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75
No road tests of dry for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 61 |
g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 71
Proxes RA1: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64
No road tests of wet for g-Force Sport COMP-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 58 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 34 |
Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.4 = 49
No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 66 |
g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 66
Proxes RA1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 70 |
g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 66
Proxes RA1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No road tests of noise for g-Force Sport COMP-2 or Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 70 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 68 |
g-Force Sport COMP-2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 62.9 = 67
Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 69 | 73 |
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 | Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 69 |
| Dry | 69 | 75 |
| Wet | 71 | 64 |
| Snow | – | 49 |
| Comfort | 66 | 67 |
| Noise | 66 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
g-Force Sport COMP-2
Proxes RA1
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 | B · Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance Summer tire | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 7 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 AA A | 100 AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 44 psi |
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2
Toyo Proxes RA1
Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 and Toyo Proxes RA1 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 is stronger on wet. Toyo Proxes RA1 is stronger on dry. BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2 scores 71 vs 64 on wet.
Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 75 vs 69 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
BFGoodrich g-Force Sport COMP-2, 71 vs 64 on our wet score.
Toyo Proxes RA1, 75 vs 69 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology