Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 vs Laufenn G Fit 4S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 6 road tests and 56 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

G Fit 4S is ahead, 75–68

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2

g-Grip All Season 2

All Season

± 6

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 64 · 56 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 14 in 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (snow braking)

Laufenn G Fit 4S
Tire BLaufenn

G Fit 4S

All Season

± 6

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 80 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test (wet circle)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    G Fit 4S +14
    72
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 6 tests6165
    Reviews found online5481
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–090%86%

    g-Grip All Season 2: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 54.1 = 58

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 81.1 = 72

  2. 67

    Wet

    G Fit 4S +18
    85
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 6 tests7086
    Reviews found online6285
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–189%91%

    g-Grip All Season 2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 62.4 = 67

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 84.8 = 85

  3. 81

    Snow

    g-Grip All Season 2 +4
    77
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 2 tests8777
    Reviews found online7277

    g-Grip All Season 2: 60% × 87.4 + 40% × 72.3 = 81

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 77 = 77

  4. 67

    Comfort

    G Fit 4S +8
    75
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)72
    Reviews found online6678

    g-Grip All Season 2: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.5 = 67

    G Fit 4S: 40% × 71.6 + 60% × 78.1 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for g-Grip All Season 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 70

    Noise

    g-Grip All Season 2 +32
    38
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 2 tests7218
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    g-Grip All Season 2: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 18.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 38

    No owner ratings of noise for g-Grip All Season 2 or G Fit 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    G Fit 4S +2
    75
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests7472
    Reviews found online7179

    g-Grip All Season 2: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 70.5 = 73

    G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 78.5 = 75

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    G Fit 4S +19
    80
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2G Fit 4S
    Reviews found online6180
  8. 73

    Efficiency

    g-Grip All Season 2 +26
    47
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Grip All Season 2G Fit 4S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 2 tests7347
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 vs Laufenn G Fit 4S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2Laufenn G Fit 4S
Relative Score 68 75
Dry 58 72
Wet 67 85
Snow 81 77
Comfort 67 75
Noise 70 38
Treadwear 73 75
Handling (owners) 61 80
Efficiency 73 47

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

g-Grip All Season 2

± 6

G Fit 4S

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 finished ahead 1 times and Laufenn G Fit 4S 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryg-Grip All Season 2G Fit 4SΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 90% 86% +3.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 225/50 R17
Wet Braking Wet 89% 91% −1.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 225/50 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #18/32 #21/32 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 225/50 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Grip All Season 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Great value for the price point
  • Strong wet and winter weather traction

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls leading to a mushy or less responsive cornering feel
  • Odd initial steering response that requires getting used to
  • Can struggle with high-horsepower rear-wheel-drive applications
All owner themes in the g-Grip All Season 2 review

Tire B G Fit 4S

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
  • High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
  • Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
All owner themes in the G Fit 4S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 B · Laufenn G Fit 4S
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4879
Rim diameters14″ – 19″13″ – 20″
UTQG—640 B A
Sizes in common4545

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2

Laufenn G Fit 4S

Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 if noise, efficiency and snow matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 scores 70 vs 38 on noise.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2 scores 73 vs 47 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 80 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 85 vs 67 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2
Tire B · Laufenn G Fit 4S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Grip All Season 2 or G Fit 4S?

Which is better in the wet, g-Grip All Season 2 or G Fit 4S?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 85 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Grip All Season 2 or G Fit 4S?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 72 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, g-Grip All Season 2 or G Fit 4S?

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2, 81 vs 77 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, g-Grip All Season 2 or G Fit 4S?

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2, 70 vs 38 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Grip All Season 2 or G Fit 4S?

Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Grip All Season 2 or G Fit 4S?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, g-Grip All Season 2 or G Fit 4S?

BFGoodrich g-Grip All Season 2, 73 vs 47 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology