tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 vs Firestone Destination M/T2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 44 + 39 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 and Destination M/T2 are level at 67.

Check price on Amazon · Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 Check price on Amazon · Destination M/T2
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Destination M/T2 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Destination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6668

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 67

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Mud-Terrain T/A KM2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Destination M/T2 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Destination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6672

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM2: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Mud-Terrain T/A KM2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 68

    Snow

    Destination M/T2 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Destination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6672

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM2: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 68

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 71

    No road tests of snow for Mud-Terrain T/A KM2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 +4
    63
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Destination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6660

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM2: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67

    Destination M/T2: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 59.7 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Destination M/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 +1
    59
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Destination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4948

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 60

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 59

    No road tests of noise for Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Destination M/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 +11
    56
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Destination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6750

    Mud-Terrain T/A KM2: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for Mud-Terrain T/A KM2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceMud-Terrain T/A KM2Destination M/T2
    Reviews found online68–
Scores at a glance
CategoryBFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2Firestone Destination M/T2
Relative Score 67 67
Dry 67 68
Wet 67 72
Snow 68 71
Comfort 67 63
Noise 60 59
Treadwear 67 56
Handling (owners) 68 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Mud-Terrain T/A KM2

± 8

Destination M/T2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Mud-Terrain T/A KM2

Pros

  • Aggressive and appealing visual aesthetic with iconic sidewall design
  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, gravel, sand, and snow
  • Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire, especially when new

Cons

  • Develops a louder highway hum or 'whine' as mileage increases
  • Can experience reduced traction or oversteer on wet pavement for some drivers
  • Occasional tendency to spin on loose dry rock rather than bite
All owner themes in the Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 review

Tire B Destination M/T2

Pros

  • Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
  • Good highway manners and stable handling

Cons

  • Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
  • Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
  • Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
All owner themes in the Destination M/T2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 B · Firestone Destination M/T2
CategoryMud-Terrain tireMud-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available118
Rim diameters17″15″ – 20″
Tread depth17 - 20/32″19/32″
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White LetteringOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure50 - 65 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2

Firestone Destination M/T2

Too close to call: BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 and Firestone Destination M/T2 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Firestone Destination M/T2 is stronger on wet and snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 scores 67 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 72 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 scores 67 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 71 vs 68 on snow.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Firestone Destination M/T2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Destination M/T2?

Which is better in the wet, Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Destination M/T2?

Firestone Destination M/T2, 72 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Destination M/T2?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Destination M/T2?

Firestone Destination M/T2, 71 vs 68 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Destination M/T2?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 59 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Destination M/T2?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2, 67 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Mud-Terrain T/A KM2 or Destination M/T2?

BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM2, 67 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology