Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 123 reviews
Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 vs Hankook Dynapro M/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 123 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +266Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 68 64 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68
Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 66
No road tests of dry for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +568Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 74 66 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73
Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68
No road tests of wet for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
Dynapro M/T +169Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 67 68 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
Dynapro M/T: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69
No road tests of snow for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +858Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 53 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.8 = 66
Dynapro M/T: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 53.2 = 58
No road tests of comfort for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
65
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 63 – Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65
No road tests of noise for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 +266Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro M/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 70 66 Mud-Terrain T/A KM3: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 68
Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Mud-Terrain T/A KM3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison61Why this score
Source Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 Dynapro M/T Reviews found online – 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 | Hankook Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 66 |
| Dry | 68 | 66 |
| Wet | 73 | 68 |
| Snow | 68 | 69 |
| Comfort | 66 | 58 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 68 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Dynapro M/T
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Pros
- Outstanding off-road and mud traction
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
- Impressive tread wear and longevity
Cons
- Do not perform quite as well as dedicated road tires during on-road driving
Tire B Dynapro M/T
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
- Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD
Cons
- Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
- Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
- Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 | B · Hankook Dynapro M/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mud-Terrain tire | Mud-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 27 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 18/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 45 - 80 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3
Hankook Dynapro M/T
Narrow edge: BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 — better comfort and wet. Where the Hankook Dynapro M/T is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 66 vs 58 on comfort.
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 scores 73 vs 68 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro M/T?
Which is better in the wet, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro M/T?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 73 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro M/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro M/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro M/T?
BFGoodrich Mud-Terrain T/A KM3, 66 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Mud-Terrain T/A KM3 or Dynapro M/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology