Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 20 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A vs Hankook Dynapro HP2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 20 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Urban Terrain T/A is ahead, 74–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Urban Terrain T/A +1658Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A Dynapro HP2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 77 52 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
Dynapro HP2: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 58
No road tests of dry for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
76
Wet
Urban Terrain T/A +2056Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A Dynapro HP2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 79 50 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 76
Dynapro HP2: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
No road tests of wet for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
Urban Terrain T/A +1159Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A Dynapro HP2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 69 51 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70
Dynapro HP2: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 59
No road tests of snow for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
73
Comfort
Urban Terrain T/A +2053Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A Dynapro HP2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 75 46 Urban Terrain T/A: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 75.3 = 73
Dynapro HP2: 40% × 64.1 (est.) + 60% × 45.9 = 53
No road tests of comfort for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
75
Treadwear
Urban Terrain T/A +2352Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A Dynapro HP2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 80 42 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 80.2 = 75
Dynapro HP2: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 52
No road tests of treadwear for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
74
Handling (owners)
Urban Terrain T/A +2648Why this score
Source Urban Terrain T/A Dynapro HP2 Reviews found online 74 48
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A | Hankook Dynapro HP2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 56 |
| Dry | 74 | 58 |
| Wet | 76 | 56 |
| Snow | 70 | 59 |
| Comfort | 73 | 53 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 52 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 48 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Urban Terrain T/A
56
/ 100
Dynapro HP2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Urban Terrain T/A
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
- Comfortable ride quality with good impact absorption
Cons
- Higher road noise compared to standard highway or summer tires
- Slight negative impact on fuel economy/rolling resistance
- Average braking and handling performance when pushed to extremes
Tire B Dynapro HP2
Pros
- Reliable handling and roadability on dry pavement
- Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance contributing to high MPG
- Capably handles towing duties on all-wheel-drive vehicles
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by multiple users
- Poor wet weather performance and dangerous sliding tendencies in rain
- Inconsistent snow traction, with some users noting a lack of confidence in winter conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A | B · Hankook Dynapro HP2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 18 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 360 - 820 A A |
| Sizes in common | 17 | 17 |
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A
56
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HP2
Winner: BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 74 vs 48 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 75 vs 52 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 76 vs 56 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 73 vs 53 on comfort.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Urban Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP2?
Which is better in the wet, Urban Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP2?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 76 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Urban Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP2?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 74 vs 58 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Urban Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP2?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 70 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Urban Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP2?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 73 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Urban Terrain T/A or Dynapro HP2?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 75 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology