Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 8 reviews
Continental CrossContact A/TR vs BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 20 owner reviews. How we score
Urban Terrain T/A leads, 75–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 20 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
Urban Terrain T/A +274Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Urban Terrain T/A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 74 77 CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 72
Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
No road tests of dry for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
Urban Terrain T/A +376Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Urban Terrain T/A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 74 79 CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 73
Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 76
No road tests of wet for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison70Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Urban Terrain T/A Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online – 69 Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70
No road tests of snow for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
Urban Terrain T/A +773Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Urban Terrain T/A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 65 75 CrossContact A/TR: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66
Urban Terrain T/A: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 75.3 = 73
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Urban Terrain T/A +875Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Urban Terrain T/A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 67 80 CrossContact A/TR: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67
Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 80.2 = 75
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact A/TR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Urban Terrain T/A +374Why this score
Source CrossContact A/TR Urban Terrain T/A Reviews found online 71 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact A/TR | BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 75 |
| Dry | 72 | 74 |
| Wet | 73 | 76 |
| Snow | – | 70 |
| Comfort | 66 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact A/TR
Urban Terrain T/A
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact A/TR
Pros
- Exceptional tread wear and mileage longevity, with multiple users reporting over 70,000 to 80,000 miles (or 130,000 km) of use.
- Impressive dry grip and confident handling.
- Strong performance in snow and winter conditions, with some users highlighting exceptional traction on ice and steep gradients.
Cons
- A stiffer, more jarring, and less comfortable ride quality compared to competing all-terrain tires.
- Mixed feedback regarding hydroplaning resistance and heavy winter snow usage.
- Potential customer service and warranty claim challenges regarding premature tread wear.
Tire B Urban Terrain T/A
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Strong grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
- Comfortable ride quality with good impact absorption
Cons
- Higher road noise compared to standard highway or summer tires
- Slight negative impact on fuel economy/rolling resistance
- Average braking and handling performance when pushed to extremes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact A/TR | B · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 35 | 18 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 12 | 12 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact A/TR
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A
Narrow edge: BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental CrossContact A/TR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 75 vs 67 on treadwear.
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 73 vs 66 on comfort.
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 76 vs 73 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact A/TR or Urban Terrain T/A?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact A/TR or Urban Terrain T/A?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 76 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact A/TR or Urban Terrain T/A?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact A/TR or Urban Terrain T/A?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 73 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact A/TR or Urban Terrain T/A?
BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 75 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology