Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Dynapro HP2 vs BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 20 owner reviews. How we score

Urban Terrain T/A is ahead, 74–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Dynapro HP2
Tire AHankook

Dynapro HP2

All-Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    Urban Terrain T/A +16
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Urban Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online5277

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 58

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 56

    Wet

    Urban Terrain T/A +20
    76
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Urban Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online5079

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 76

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 59

    Snow

    Urban Terrain T/A +11
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Urban Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5169

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 59

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 53

    Comfort

    Urban Terrain T/A +20
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Urban Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4675

    Dynapro HP2: 40% × 64.1 (est.) + 60% × 45.9 = 53

    Urban Terrain T/A: 40% × 70 (est.) + 60% × 75.3 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 52

    Treadwear

    Urban Terrain T/A +23
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Urban Terrain T/A
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online4280

    Dynapro HP2: 60% × 57.8 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 52

    Urban Terrain T/A: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 80.2 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Urban Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 48

    Handling (owners)

    Urban Terrain T/A +26
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDynapro HP2Urban Terrain T/A
    Reviews found online4874
Scores at a glance
Hankook Dynapro HP2 vs BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Dynapro HP2BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A
Relative Score 56 74
Dry 58 74
Wet 56 76
Snow 59 70
Comfort 53 73
Treadwear 52 75
Handling (owners) 48 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dynapro HP2

± 8

Urban Terrain T/A

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dynapro HP2

Pros

  • Reliable handling and roadability on dry pavement
  • Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance contributing to high MPG
  • Capably handles towing duties on all-wheel-drive vehicles

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear reported by multiple users
  • Poor wet weather performance and dangerous sliding tendencies in rain
  • Inconsistent snow traction, with some users noting a lack of confidence in winter conditions
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP2 review

Tire B Urban Terrain T/A

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Strong grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
  • Comfortable ride quality with good impact absorption

Cons

  • Higher road noise compared to standard highway or summer tires
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy/rolling resistance
  • Average braking and handling performance when pushed to extremes
All owner themes in the Urban Terrain T/A review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Dynapro HP2 B · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A
CategoryAll-SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4418
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 18″
UTQG360 - 820 A A—
Sizes in common1717

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Dynapro HP2

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A

Winner: BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 74 vs 48 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 75 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 76 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A scores 73 vs 53 on comfort.

Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HP2
Tire B · BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dynapro HP2 or Urban Terrain T/A?

Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HP2 or Urban Terrain T/A?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 76 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HP2 or Urban Terrain T/A?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 74 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dynapro HP2 or Urban Terrain T/A?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 70 vs 59 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HP2 or Urban Terrain T/A?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 73 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dynapro HP2 or Urban Terrain T/A?

BFGoodrich Urban Terrain T/A, 75 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology