Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 3 reviews
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental IceContact 2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom vs Continental IceContact 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 3 + 2 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Winter Slalom 70, IceContact 2 69.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 2 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Autocenter Studded Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
IceContact 2 +169Why this score
Source Winter Slalom IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 68 67 Winter Slalom: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68
IceContact 2: 60% × 71.4 + 40% × 66.6 = 69
No road tests of dry for Winter Slalom. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
74
Wet
Winter Slalom +371Why this score
Source Winter Slalom IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 75 72 Winter Slalom: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 74
IceContact 2: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 72 = 71
No road tests of wet for Winter Slalom. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison77Why this score
Source Winter Slalom IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 78 Reviews found online – 76 IceContact 2: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 75.6 = 77
-
70
Comfort
Winter Slalom +466Why this score
Source Winter Slalom IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 71 63 Winter Slalom: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70
IceContact 2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Winter Slalom or IceContact 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Winter Slalom +165Why this score
Source Winter Slalom IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 67 65 Winter Slalom: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 66
IceContact 2: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Winter Slalom. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for IceContact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
67
Handling (owners)
IceContact 2 +471Why this score
Source Winter Slalom IceContact 2 Reviews found online 67 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Winter Slalom | Continental IceContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 69 |
| Dry | 68 | 69 |
| Wet | 74 | 71 |
| Snow | – | 77 |
| Comfort | 70 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Winter Slalom
IceContact 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Winter Slalom
Pros
- Strong traction in snow and wet conditions
- Aggressive tread profile
- Low road noise
Cons
- Significant loss of grip as the tire ages
- Performance degradation on wet surfaces after several years of use
Tire B IceContact 2
Pros
- Excellent traction on snow and ice-covered surfaces
- Surprisingly comfortable and quiet ride for a studded tire
- Reliable handling and stability in severe winter conditions
Cons
- Increased road noise when driving on dry or clean pavement
- Noticeable degradation in ice grip performance after two seasons of use
- Requires precise tire pressure maintenance to ensure optimal wet-weather handling
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Winter Slalom | B · Continental IceContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Touring tires | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom
Continental IceContact 2
Too close to call: BFGoodrich Winter Slalom and Continental IceContact 2 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich Winter Slalom is stronger on comfort and wet. BFGoodrich Winter Slalom rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom scores 70 vs 66 on comfort.
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom scores 74 vs 71 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Winter Slalom or IceContact 2?
Which is better in the wet, Winter Slalom or IceContact 2?
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom, 74 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Winter Slalom or IceContact 2?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Winter Slalom or IceContact 2?
BFGoodrich Winter Slalom, 70 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Winter Slalom or IceContact 2?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology