Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Continental IceContact 2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Continental IceContact 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 26 + 2 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact LX25 leads, 73–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 2 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Autocenter Studded Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
CrossContact LX25 +769Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 70 71 Reviews found online 83 66 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83.4 = 76
IceContact 2: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 66.4 = 69
-
80
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +971Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 78 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 84 72 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.8 (est.) + 40% × 83.5 = 80
IceContact 2: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 71.8 = 71
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
IceContact 2 +2376Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 40 78 Reviews found online 72 73 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.3 + 40% × 72.1 = 53
IceContact 2: 60% × 78 + 40% × 73 = 76
-
77
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +1265Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 80 63 CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77
IceContact 2: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.6 = 65
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25 or IceContact 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 78 – CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 71
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
CrossContact LX25 +765Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 75 64 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72
IceContact 2: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for IceContact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
79
Handling (owners)
CrossContact LX25 +970Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 IceContact 2 Reviews found online 79 70 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison63Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Continental IceContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 70 |
| Dry | 76 | 69 |
| Wet | 80 | 71 |
| Snow | 53 | 76 |
| Comfort | 77 | 65 |
| Noise | 71 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 70 |
| Efficiency | – | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact LX25
IceContact 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | CrossContact LX25 | IceContact 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 100% #1/8 · 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 68% #3/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 95% #4/8 · 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | #5/5 2021 Test World Winter Studded Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B IceContact 2
Pros
- Excellent traction on snow and ice-covered surfaces
- Surprisingly comfortable and quiet ride for a studded tire
- Reliable handling and stability in severe winter conditions
Cons
- Increased road noise when driving on dry or clean pavement
- Noticeable degradation in ice grip performance after two seasons of use
- Requires precise tire pressure maintenance to ensure optimal wet-weather handling
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Continental IceContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Continental IceContact 2
Narrow edge: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the Continental IceContact 2 if snow matters most to you.
Continental IceContact 2 scores 76 vs 53 on snow.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 77 vs 65 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 71 on wet.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 70 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or IceContact 2?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or IceContact 2?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or IceContact 2?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or IceContact 2?
Continental IceContact 2, 76 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or IceContact 2?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 77 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or IceContact 2?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology