Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 15 road tests and 13 + 1,124 owner reviews. How we score

Weather Control A005 EVO leads, 67–65 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
± 5

Tests 71 · 15 tests Owners 58 · 1,124 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (wet braking (concrete))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Weather Control A005 EVO +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraWeather Control A005 EVO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests≈ 67 (est.)79
    Reviews found online6564

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66

    Weather Control A005 EVO: 60% × 79.3 + 40% × 63.7 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Weather Control A005 EVO +15
    84
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraWeather Control A005 EVO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests≈ 70 (est.)91
    Reviews found online6972

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    Weather Control A005 EVO: 60% × 91.3 + 40% × 72 = 84

    No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Alenza AS Ultra +25
    45
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraWeather Control A005 EVO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 70 (est.)37
    Reviews found online6958

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 70

    Weather Control A005 EVO: 60% × 36.9 + 40% × 57.6 = 45

    No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Alenza AS Ultra +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraWeather Control A005 EVO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 67 (est.)68
    Reviews found online6259

    Alenza AS Ultra: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64

    Weather Control A005 EVO: 40% × 68.4 + 60% × 58.9 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    Weather Control A005 EVO +8
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraWeather Control A005 EVO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 66 (est.)73
    Reviews found online56≈ 66 (est.)

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 62

    Weather Control A005 EVO: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70

    No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Weather Control A005 EVO. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Alenza AS Ultra +2
    52
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraWeather Control A005 EVO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 59 (est.)61
    Reviews found online4638

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 54

    Weather Control A005 EVO: 60% × 60.5 + 40% × 38 = 52

    No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Alenza AS Ultra +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraWeather Control A005 EVO
    Reviews found online6362
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    80
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraWeather Control A005 EVO
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests–80
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Alenza AS UltraBridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
Relative Score 65 67
Dry 66 73
Wet 69 84
Snow 70 45
Comfort 64 63
Noise 62 70
Treadwear 54 52
Handling (owners) 63 62
Efficiency – 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Alenza AS Ultra

± 5

Weather Control A005 EVO

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Alenza AS Ultra

Pros

  • Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
  • Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
  • Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
  • Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
  • Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
All owner themes in the Alenza AS Ultra review

Tire B Weather Control A005 EVO

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and resistance to aquaplaning
  • Quiet operation and low road noise
  • Improved ride comfort and compliant, softer sidewalls

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, particularly on front-wheel-drive or electric vehicles
  • Softer compound can result in increased roll during cornering or a floaty feel on the highway
  • Reports of cracking or tread block separation over time
All owner themes in the Weather Control A005 EVO review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra B · Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4682
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 21″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG800 A A—
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

Narrow edge: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO — better wet, noise and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra if snow matters most to you. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 70 vs 45 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO scores 84 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO scores 70 vs 62 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO scores 73 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Alenza AS Ultra or Weather Control A005 EVO?

Which is better in the wet, Alenza AS Ultra or Weather Control A005 EVO?

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO, 84 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Alenza AS Ultra or Weather Control A005 EVO?

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO, 73 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Alenza AS Ultra or Weather Control A005 EVO?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 70 vs 45 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Alenza AS Ultra or Weather Control A005 EVO?

Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO, 70 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Alenza AS Ultra or Weather Control A005 EVO?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 63 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Alenza AS Ultra or Weather Control A005 EVO?

Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 52 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology