tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Continental CrossContact LX25 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 13 + 26 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 73–65

Check price on Amazon · CrossContact LX25 or Alenza AS Ultra on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +10
    76
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraCrossContact LX25
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6583

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83.4 = 76

    No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 70

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +10
    80
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraCrossContact LX25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 78 (est.)
    Reviews found online6984

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.8 (est.) + 40% × 83.5 = 80

    No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Alenza AS Ultra +17
    53
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraCrossContact LX25
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)40
    Reviews found online6972

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.3 + 40% × 72.1 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +12
    77
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraCrossContact LX25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6380

    Alenza AS Ultra: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 62.9 = 65

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra or CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 63

    Noise

    CrossContact LX25 +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraCrossContact LX25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5678

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 63

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 71

    No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra or CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +18
    72
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraCrossContact LX25
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4675

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 46.2 = 54

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +16
    79
    Why this score
    SourceAlenza AS UltraCrossContact LX25
    Reviews found online6379
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Alenza AS UltraContinental CrossContact LX25
Relative Score 65 73
Dry 66 76
Wet 70 80
Snow 70 53
Comfort 65 77
Noise 63 71
Treadwear 54 72
Handling (owners) 63 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Alenza AS Ultra

± 7

CrossContact LX25

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Alenza AS Ultra

Pros

  • Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
  • Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
  • Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
  • Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
  • Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
All owner themes in the Alenza AS Ultra review

Tire B CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra B · Continental CrossContact LX25
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4640
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″10 - 12/32″
UTQG800 A A740 A A - B
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure44 psi44 - 51 psi
Sizes in common2525

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra

Continental CrossContact LX25

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra if snow matters most to you. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 72 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 70 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 77 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental CrossContact LX25
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Alenza AS Ultra or CrossContact LX25?

Which is better in the wet, Alenza AS Ultra or CrossContact LX25?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Alenza AS Ultra or CrossContact LX25?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Alenza AS Ultra or CrossContact LX25?

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 70 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Alenza AS Ultra or CrossContact LX25?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Alenza AS Ultra or CrossContact LX25?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 77 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Alenza AS Ultra or CrossContact LX25?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology