Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 13 reviews
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Pirelli Scorpion Zero All Season — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 306 owner reviews. How we score
Alenza AS Ultra leads, 65–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 306 reviews
“Tire replacement Looking to replace the Pirelli Scorpion Zero all seasons on my ‘23 Volvo XC40 recharge. Are people sticking with the OEM tires or is there another all season tire you would recommend. Looking for similar ride quality with more wear than the Pirellis.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Level66Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Scorpion Zero All Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 65 66 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66
Scorpion Zero All Season: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66
No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Scorpion Zero All Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
69
Wet
Alenza AS Ultra +465Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Scorpion Zero All Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 62 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 69
Scorpion Zero All Season: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 65
No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Scorpion Zero All Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
Alenza AS Ultra +762Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Scorpion Zero All Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 56 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69
Scorpion Zero All Season: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 62
No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Scorpion Zero All Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
64
Comfort
Level64Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Scorpion Zero All Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 62 63 Alenza AS Ultra: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64
Scorpion Zero All Season: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
No road tests of comfort for Scorpion Zero All Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
-
62
Noise
Scorpion Zero All Season +466Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Scorpion Zero All Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 56 66 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 62
Scorpion Zero All Season: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 66
No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra or Scorpion Zero All Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
Alenza AS Ultra +450Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Scorpion Zero All Season Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 46 39 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 54
Scorpion Zero All Season: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 39.3 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Zero All Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
63
Handling (owners)
Alenza AS Ultra +261Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Scorpion Zero All Season Reviews found online 63 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Pirelli Scorpion Zero All Season |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 62 |
| Dry | 66 | 66 |
| Wet | 69 | 65 |
| Snow | 69 | 62 |
| Comfort | 64 | 64 |
| Noise | 62 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Alenza AS Ultra
Scorpion Zero All Season
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Alenza AS Ultra
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
Tire B Scorpion Zero All Season
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and low road noise for an all-season tire
- Enhanced ride comfort and smooth handling compared to standard OEM or summer tires
- Reliable dry grip and stability across various driving conditions
Cons
- Shorter than expected treadlife and rapid wear reported by some users
- Reduced traction and potential hydroplaning concerns in heavy wet conditions
- High replacement price point relative to perceived longevity
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Pirelli Scorpion Zero All Season
Owners often praise the Scorpion Zero All Season for quiet, comfortable ride, good grip in wet and light snow, and a better feel than winter or summer tires. Many others complain about short tread life, uneven or chunky wear, and vibrations or foam-related issues at around 25k miles. The tire's high price and the question of whether the Plus 3 or other brands are better value come up often.
“Ran across a set of 4 scorpion zero all season 275/40/20 106V XL for $250 ( 90% tread left ) .how much performance loss am I going to have from the stock P Zero tires I have now.”
“At 25,000 miles tires developed "serious" vibrations this time at 47MPH and feels like it is in the front, last time it felt like the back. This was a real safety concern for handling. Not taking them in for another $200 Road Force balance, replaced all four tires today with Yokohama Geolandar X-CV - 275/45R21 110W. No problem yet, up to 55MPH but still need a road trip to see how it does up to 80MPH. I think this hot Florida weather is melting the glue holding the foam in place. The OEM tires were: Pirelli Scorpion Zero A/S 275/45R21/XL 110W PNCS. I did not contact Pirelli as I don't want any of these PNCS tires on my vehicles. PNCS will be on the sidewall, indicating the use of foam inside of the tire.”
“I too need new tires on my 2019 XC60 AWD T6 Inscription and am unsure whether to get the same OEM 19" Scorpion Zero A/S (VOL) for $1395 installed or the Scorpion All Season Plus 3 installed for $1161. Any one else with recent comparisons. The life on the OEM seems worse, and the price is ~$230 more and Tirerack has worse reviews, but I'm afraid to rock the boat with what is otherwise a fine tire for fear of altering the drive dynamic too much.”
Based on 37 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Pirelli Scorpion Zero All Season |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | 58 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 17″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 800 A A | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 22 | 22 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Pirelli Scorpion Zero All Season
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Pirelli Scorpion Zero All Season if noise matters most to you. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 69 vs 62 on snow.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 69 vs 65 on wet.
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 54 vs 50 on treadwear.
Pirelli Scorpion Zero All Season scores 66 vs 62 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Alenza AS Ultra or Scorpion Zero All Season?
Which is better in the wet, Alenza AS Ultra or Scorpion Zero All Season?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 69 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Alenza AS Ultra or Scorpion Zero All Season?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Alenza AS Ultra or Scorpion Zero All Season?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 69 vs 62 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Alenza AS Ultra or Scorpion Zero All Season?
Pirelli Scorpion Zero All Season, 66 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Alenza AS Ultra or Scorpion Zero All Season?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Alenza AS Ultra or Scorpion Zero All Season?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra, 54 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology