Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 13 reviews
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Toyo Open Country WT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Open Country WT is ahead, 75–69
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Open Country WT +575Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Open Country WT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 72 79 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70
Open Country WT: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75
No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
Open Country WT +779Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Open Country WT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 77 (est.) Reviews found online 73 83 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 72
Open Country WT: 60% × 77.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.9 = 79
No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Snow
Open Country WT +272Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Open Country WT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 71 74 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
Open Country WT: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 72
No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
Open Country WT +473Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Open Country WT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 68 77 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69
Open Country WT: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra or Open Country WT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Open Country WT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 61 – Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 65
No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
Open Country WT +971Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Open Country WT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 59 75 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62
Open Country WT: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.5 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Open Country WT +1180Why this score
Source Alenza AS Ultra Open Country WT Reviews found online 69 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Toyo Open Country WT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 75 |
| Dry | 70 | 75 |
| Wet | 72 | 79 |
| Snow | 70 | 72 |
| Comfort | 69 | 73 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 62 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Alenza AS Ultra
Open Country WT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Alenza AS Ultra
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
Tire B Open Country WT
Pros
- Exceptional performance and traction in snow, ice, slush, and wet weather
- Surprising longevity and slow tread wear over high mileage (20,000 to 30,000 miles)
- Good versatility and capability for light off-road use, unmade tracks, and muddy fields
Cons
- Slightly increased road noise compared to standard road tires, though not overly intrusive
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Toyo Open Country WT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | 8 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 16″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Toyo Open Country WT
Winner: Toyo Open Country WT — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Open Country WT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Open Country WT scores 80 vs 69 on handling.
Toyo Open Country WT scores 71 vs 62 on treadwear.
Toyo Open Country WT scores 79 vs 72 on wet.
Toyo Open Country WT scores 75 vs 70 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Alenza AS Ultra or Open Country WT?
Which is better in the wet, Alenza AS Ultra or Open Country WT?
Toyo Open Country WT, 79 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Alenza AS Ultra or Open Country WT?
Toyo Open Country WT, 75 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Alenza AS Ultra or Open Country WT?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Alenza AS Ultra or Open Country WT?
Toyo Open Country WT, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Alenza AS Ultra or Open Country WT?
Toyo Open Country WT, 71 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology