Cooper CS2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone B250 vs Cooper CS2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 48 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

CS2 is ahead, 68–49

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone B250

B250

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 48 reviews

Cooper CS2
Tire BCooper

CS2

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 45

    Dry

    CS2 +23
    68
    Why this score
    SourceB250CS2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online3267

    B250: 60% × 53.3 (est.) + 40% × 32.4 = 45

    CS2: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    No road tests of dry for B250. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for CS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 50

    Wet

    CS2 +18
    68
    Why this score
    SourceB250CS2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4267

    B250: 60% × 54.9 (est.) + 40% × 41.8 = 50

    CS2: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of wet for B250. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for CS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 50

    Comfort

    CS2 +19
    69
    Why this score
    SourceB250CS2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4170

    B250: 40% × 63.1 (est.) + 60% × 40.8 = 50

    CS2: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.5 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for B250. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for CS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 56

    Treadwear

    CS2 +13
    69
    Why this score
    SourceB250CS2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4970

    B250: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 56

    CS2: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for B250. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for CS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 41

    Handling (owners)

    CS2 +29
    70
    Why this score
    SourceB250CS2
    Reviews found online4170
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone B250 vs Cooper CS2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone B250Cooper CS2
Relative Score 49 68
Dry 45 68
Wet 50 68
Comfort 50 69
Treadwear 56 69
Handling (owners) 41 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

B250

± 8

CS2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A B250

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Reliable handling and grip on dry tarmac
  • Cost-effective for daily commuting

Cons

  • Significant lack of grip in wet conditions
  • High levels of road noise
  • Inconsistent tread wear rates depending on vehicle weight
All owner themes in the B250 review

Tire B CS2

Pros

  • Long-lasting tread life and slow wear rate over thousands of miles
  • Good value for money
  • Quiet operation and low noise levels

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather grip and a tendency to slip in heavy rain
  • Prone to wheel spin during hard acceleration in dry conditions for some vehicles
  • Mediocre performance on loose surfaces
All owner themes in the CS2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone B250 B · Cooper CS2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available12—
Rim diameters13″ – 16″—
UTQG200 A - B A - B—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone B250

Cooper CS2

Winner: Cooper CS2 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Cooper CS2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Cooper CS2 scores 70 vs 41 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Cooper CS2 scores 68 vs 45 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Cooper CS2 scores 69 vs 50 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Cooper CS2 scores 68 vs 50 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone B250
Tire B · Cooper CS2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

B250 or CS2?

Which is better in the wet, B250 or CS2?

Cooper CS2, 68 vs 50 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, B250 or CS2?

Cooper CS2, 68 vs 45 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, B250 or CS2?

Cooper CS2, 69 vs 50 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, B250 or CS2?

Cooper CS2, 69 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology