Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport vs Michelin Pilot Road 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 22 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Road 3 is ahead, 82–70
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 88 · 22 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Pilot Road 3 +1081Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Pilot Road 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 77 (est.) Reviews found online 73 89 Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
Pilot Road 3: 60% × 76.7 (est.) + 40% × 88.6 = 81
No road tests of dry for Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Pilot Road 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
Pilot Road 3 +1486Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Pilot Road 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 82 (est.) Reviews found online 72 91 Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 72
Pilot Road 3: 60% × 82 (est.) + 40% × 91 = 86
No road tests of wet for Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Pilot Road 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Comfort
Pilot Road 3 +880Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Pilot Road 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 73 85 Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 73.2 = 72
Pilot Road 3: 40% × 72.1 (est.) + 60% × 85.4 = 80
No road tests of comfort for Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Pilot Road 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
Pilot Road 3 +1477Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Pilot Road 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 62 84 Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 63
Pilot Road 3: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 83.9 = 77
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Road 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
74
Handling (owners)
Pilot Road 3 +1387Why this score
Source Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport Pilot Road 3 Reviews found online 74 87
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport | Michelin Pilot Road 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 82 |
| Dry | 71 | 81 |
| Wet | 72 | 86 |
| Comfort | 72 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 77 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport
Pilot Road 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport
Pros
- Excellent confidence and stability in varied road conditions
- Strong performance in both wet and dry weather
- Effective absorption of road bumps and irregularities
Cons
- Lack of feedback and feel at higher lean angles
- Tendency to square off during long-distance or motorway riding
- Performance limits are reached quickly during aggressive, high-speed riding
Tire B Pilot Road 3
Pros
- Outstanding wet-weather traction and cornering grip
- Confident performance and stability across varied road conditions
- Improved steering agility and handling compared to older models
Cons
- Shorter tread life reported by aggressive riders
- Occasional complaints regarding vague front-end feedback or light steering feel
- Higher price point noted by some users
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport | B · Michelin Pilot Road 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport
Michelin Pilot Road 3
Winner: Michelin Pilot Road 3 — better wet, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Road 3 scores 86 vs 72 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Road 3 scores 77 vs 63 on treadwear.
Michelin Pilot Road 3 scores 87 vs 74 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Road 3 scores 81 vs 71 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Pilot Road 3?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Pilot Road 3?
Michelin Pilot Road 3, 86 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Pilot Road 3?
Michelin Pilot Road 3, 81 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Pilot Road 3?
Michelin Pilot Road 3, 80 vs 72 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Battlax BT016 Pro Hypersport or Pilot Road 3?
Michelin Pilot Road 3, 77 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology