Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 10 reviews
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO vs Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
ContiRoadAttack 3 leads, 71–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 70 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 6 in 2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
ContiRoadAttack 3 +673Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO ContiRoadAttack 3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 66 72 Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 67
ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 72.2 = 73
No road tests of dry for Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
68
Wet
ContiRoadAttack 3 +674Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO ContiRoadAttack 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 68 76 Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68
ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 74
No road tests of wet for Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Comfort
ContiRoadAttack 3 +267Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO ContiRoadAttack 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 63 67 Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 62.8 = 65
ContiRoadAttack 3: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 66.6 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO or ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
ContiRoadAttack 3 +165Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO ContiRoadAttack 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 62 64 Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64
ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
68
Handling (owners)
ContiRoadAttack 3 +371Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO ContiRoadAttack 3 Reviews found online 68 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO | Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 71 |
| Dry | 67 | 73 |
| Wet | 68 | 74 |
| Comfort | 65 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO
ContiRoadAttack 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO
Pros
- Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling in dry conditions
- Strong wet-weather grip and stability for touring
- Impressive overall tread life for high-mileage riders
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven front tire wear
- Lack of road feedback compared to sportier alternatives
- Slow warm-up times in cold weather
Tire B ContiRoadAttack 3
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance on paved surfaces
- High level of rider confidence
- Well-suited for sport-touring applications
Cons
- Not suitable for off-road or gravel terrain
- Susceptible to rapid tread damage when used on unpaved surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO | B · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
Narrow edge: Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 — better dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 74 vs 68 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO or ContiRoadAttack 3?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO or ContiRoadAttack 3?
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3, 74 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO or ContiRoadAttack 3?
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO or ContiRoadAttack 3?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO or ContiRoadAttack 3?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology