Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 10 reviews
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO vs Pirelli Angel ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 143 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO and Angel ST are level at 67.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO +166Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 66 65 Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 67
Angel ST: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66
No road tests of dry for Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
68
Wet
Angel ST +270Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 68 70 Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68
Angel ST: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
No road tests of wet for Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Comfort
Angel ST +368Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 63 68 Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 62.8 = 65
Angel ST: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 68 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO or Angel ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Level64Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 62 63 Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64
Angel ST: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO +266Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO Angel ST Reviews found online 68 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO | Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 67 |
| Dry | 67 | 66 |
| Wet | 68 | 70 |
| Comfort | 65 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO
Angel ST
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO
Pros
- Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling in dry conditions
- Strong wet-weather grip and stability for touring
- Impressive overall tread life for high-mileage riders
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven front tire wear
- Lack of road feedback compared to sportier alternatives
- Slow warm-up times in cold weather
Tire B Angel ST
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and high cornering confidence
- Reliable and predictable wet weather performance
- Light, neutral steering and overall straight-line stability
Cons
- Rear tire tends to wear out suddenly or rapidly once it passes the halfway mark
- Requires a short warm-up time (2-5 minutes) to reach optimal grip
- Shorter total mileage lifespan reported by aggressive riders or heavy commuters
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO | B · Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO
Pirelli Angel ST
Too close to call: Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO and Pirelli Angel ST are within 2 points overall. Pirelli Angel ST is stronger on comfort. Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pirelli Angel ST scores 68 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO or Angel ST?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO or Angel ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO or Angel ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO or Angel ST?
Pirelli Angel ST, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Battlax Sport Touring T30 EVO or Angel ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology