Tests 47 · 1 test Owners 71 · 9 reviews
Continental ContiRoad Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 vs Continental ContiRoad Attack — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 9 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
ContiRoad Attack leads, 70–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Battlax Sport Touring T32 +169Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 ContiRoad Attack Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 72 70 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
ContiRoad Attack: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69
No road tests of dry for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
60
Wet
ContiRoad Attack +1070Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 ContiRoad Attack Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 47 ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 78 70 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 47.5 + 40% × 78.3 = 60
ContiRoad Attack: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70
No road tests of wet for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Comfort
Battlax Sport Touring T32 +469Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 ContiRoad Attack Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 75 70 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 75 = 73
ContiRoad Attack: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.8 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
ContiRoad Attack +670Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 ContiRoad Attack Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 62 72 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
ContiRoad Attack: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
Battlax Sport Touring T32 +471Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 ContiRoad Attack Reviews found online 75 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | Continental ContiRoad Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 70 |
| Dry | 70 | 69 |
| Wet | 60 | 70 |
| Comfort | 73 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Battlax Sport Touring T32
70
/ 100
ContiRoad Attack
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax Sport Touring T32
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather performance and heavy rain confidence
- High-speed stability, including at autobahn speeds with full luggage
- Immediate improvement in handling agility and steering feel compared to competitors or older tires
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear and relatively low mileage lifespan
- Rear tire can slip or slide when pushed hard in dry, warm conditions
- Reduced performance feel after a few thousand miles of use
Tire B ContiRoad Attack
Pros
- Minimal warm-up time due to advanced construction technology
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering agility
- Strong longevity and consistent performance over high mileage
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Potential for front-end cupping or vibration as the tire wears
- Handling can feel overly aggressive or 'twitchy' for riders accustomed to more neutral profiles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | B · Continental ContiRoad Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32
70
/ 100
Continental ContiRoad Attack
Narrow edge: Continental ContiRoad Attack — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 if comfort matters most to you. Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental ContiRoad Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiRoad Attack scores 70 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiRoad Attack scores 70 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 scores 73 vs 69 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32
Tire B · Continental ContiRoad Attack
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax Sport Touring T32 or ContiRoad Attack?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or ContiRoad Attack?
Continental ContiRoad Attack, 70 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or ContiRoad Attack?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or ContiRoad Attack?
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or ContiRoad Attack?
Continental ContiRoad Attack, 70 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology