Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 11 reviews
Continental ContiRoad Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiRoad Attack vs Michelin Pilot Road 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 19 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Road 4 leads, 74–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 19 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Pilot Road 4 +473Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Pilot Road 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 70 76 ContiRoad Attack: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69
Pilot Road 4: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 73
No road tests of dry for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Pilot Road 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
Pilot Road 4 +878Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Pilot Road 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 70 81 ContiRoad Attack: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70
Pilot Road 4: 60% × 76.1 (est.) + 40% × 80.5 = 78
No road tests of wet for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Pilot Road 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
Pilot Road 4 +473Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Pilot Road 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 70 75 ContiRoad Attack: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.8 = 69
Pilot Road 4: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 74.8 = 73
No road tests of comfort for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Road 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Treadwear
Level70Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Pilot Road 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 72 73 ContiRoad Attack: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70
Pilot Road 4: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Road 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Pilot Road 4 +475Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Pilot Road 4 Reviews found online 71 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiRoad Attack | Michelin Pilot Road 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 74 |
| Dry | 69 | 73 |
| Wet | 70 | 78 |
| Comfort | 69 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiRoad Attack
Pilot Road 4
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiRoad Attack
Pros
- Minimal warm-up time due to advanced construction technology
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering agility
- Strong longevity and consistent performance over high mileage
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Potential for front-end cupping or vibration as the tire wears
- Handling can feel overly aggressive or 'twitchy' for riders accustomed to more neutral profiles
Tire B Pilot Road 4
Pros
- Outstanding wet weather grip and performance
- Impressive tread life and mileage longevity for touring and commuting
- Predictable and confident handling in everyday dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Slippery when brand new, requiring a cautious break-in period
- Tread pattern can cause movement or a vague front-end feel in warmer weather
- Some riders experienced uneven wear or quicker wear on the front tire
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiRoad Attack | B · Michelin Pilot Road 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiRoad Attack
Michelin Pilot Road 4
Narrow edge: Michelin Pilot Road 4 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiRoad Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Pilot Road 4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Road 4 scores 78 vs 70 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Road 4 scores 73 vs 69 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Road 4 scores 73 vs 69 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiRoad Attack or Pilot Road 4?
Which is better in the wet, ContiRoad Attack or Pilot Road 4?
Michelin Pilot Road 4, 78 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiRoad Attack or Pilot Road 4?
Michelin Pilot Road 4, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiRoad Attack or Pilot Road 4?
Michelin Pilot Road 4, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiRoad Attack or Pilot Road 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology