Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 36 reviews
Continental IceContact 2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 vs Continental IceContact 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 36 + 2 owner reviews. How we score
Blizzak DM-V2 leads, 72–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 68 · 2 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Autocenter Studded Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
IceContact 2 +269Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 67 66 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 67
IceContact 2: 60% × 71.5 + 40% × 65.8 = 69
No road tests of dry for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
75
Wet
Blizzak DM-V2 +471Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 77 72 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 75
IceContact 2: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 71.6 = 71
No road tests of wet for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
79
Snow
Blizzak DM-V2 +376Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 85 73 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 75.1 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 79
IceContact 2: 60% × 77.9 + 40% × 72.7 = 76
No road tests of snow for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Blizzak DM-V2 +564Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 69 62 Blizzak DM-V2: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.3 = 69
IceContact 2: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 61.9 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for IceContact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 69 – Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.3 = 68
No road tests of noise for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
IceContact 2 +465Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 58 65 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61
IceContact 2: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for IceContact 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
Blizzak DM-V2 +669Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 IceContact 2 Reviews found online 75 69 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison63Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 IceContact 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | Continental IceContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 70 |
| Dry | 67 | 69 |
| Wet | 75 | 71 |
| Snow | 79 | 76 |
| Comfort | 69 | 64 |
| Noise | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 61 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 69 |
| Efficiency | – | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak DM-V2
IceContact 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak DM-V2 | IceContact 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/8 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires | #5/5 2021 Test World Winter Studded Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak DM-V2
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance on snow and ice
- High level of driver confidence in severe winter weather
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Faster tread wear compared to all-season tires
- Performance degrades if left on the vehicle during warmer spring/summer months
- Potential for reduced wet-weather grip as the tire wears down
Tire B IceContact 2
Pros
- Excellent traction on snow and ice-covered surfaces
- Surprisingly comfortable and quiet ride for a studded tire
- Reliable handling and stability in severe winter conditions
Cons
- Increased road noise when driving on dry or clean pavement
- Noticeable degradation in ice grip performance after two seasons of use
- Requires precise tire pressure maintenance to ensure optimal wet-weather handling
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | B · Continental IceContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 73 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
Continental IceContact 2
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Continental IceContact 2 if treadwear matters most to you.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 75 vs 69 on handling.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 69 vs 64 on comfort.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 75 vs 71 on wet.
Continental IceContact 2 scores 65 vs 61 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak DM-V2 or IceContact 2?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak DM-V2 or IceContact 2?
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2, 75 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak DM-V2 or IceContact 2?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak DM-V2 or IceContact 2?
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2, 79 vs 76 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak DM-V2 or IceContact 2?
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2, 69 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak DM-V2 or IceContact 2?
Continental IceContact 2, 65 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology