Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 36 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 36 + 18 owner reviews. How we score
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV is ahead, 76–71
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 80 · 18 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +774Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 67 74 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 67
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 74.3 = 74
No road tests of dry for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
75
Wet
Level75Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 77 84 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 75
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 68.6 + 40% × 83.5 = 75
No road tests of wet for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
79
Snow
Level79Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 75 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 85 85 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 75.1 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 79
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 84.7 = 79
No road tests of snow for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +776Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 69 79 Blizzak DM-V2: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.4 = 69
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 79.1 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +573Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 70 84 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 68
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 65.7 + 40% × 83.5 = 73
No road tests of noise for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +1374Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 58 78 Blizzak DM-V2: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak DM-V2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +479Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Reviews found online 75 79 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison72Why this score
Source Blizzak DM-V2 Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 76 |
| Dry | 67 | 74 |
| Wet | 75 | 75 |
| Snow | 79 | 79 |
| Comfort | 69 | 76 |
| Noise | 68 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 79 |
| Efficiency | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak DM-V2
Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak DM-V2 | Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/8 2022 Consumer Reports Winter/Snow Truck/SUV Tires | #4/6 2027 NAF Motor Studless Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak DM-V2
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance on snow and ice
- High level of driver confidence in severe winter weather
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Faster tread wear compared to all-season tires
- Performance degrades if left on the vehicle during warmer spring/summer months
- Potential for reduced wet-weather grip as the tire wears down
Tire B Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction on snow and ice
- Significantly quieter than previous models and studded alternatives
- Stable and predictable handling with a firm, confident ride on dry and wet pavement
Cons
- Higher price point compared to some other tire options
- Slightly firmer ride compared to softer alternatives like Bridgestone Blizzaks
- Some minor compromises in ultimate dry and wet grip typical of soft-compound winter tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 73 | 70 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | 12/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 47 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 42 | 42 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
Winner: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 74 vs 61 on treadwear.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 74 vs 67 on dry.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 76 vs 69 on comfort.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 73 vs 68 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 74 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 79 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 73 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 76 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak DM-V2 or Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 74 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology