Hankook Icebear W300 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak Ice vs Hankook Icebear W300 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 5 + 0 road tests and 3 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Blizzak Ice and Icebear W300 are level at 62.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Blizzak Ice

Blizzak Ice

Winter

± 7

Tests 60 · 5 tests Owners 66 · 3 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 17 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (exterior noise)

Hankook Icebear W300
Tire BHankook

Icebear W300

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Blizzak Ice +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceIcebear W300
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests64≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6758

    Blizzak Ice: 60% × 63.8 + 40% × 67.3 = 65

    Icebear W300: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 62

    No road tests of dry for Icebear W300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 53

    Wet

    Icebear W300 +9
    62
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceIcebear W300
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests42≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7059

    Blizzak Ice: 60% × 42.5 + 40% × 69.8 = 53

    Icebear W300: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62

    No road tests of wet for Icebear W300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceIcebear W300
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests63–
    Reviews found online62–

    Blizzak Ice: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 62.2 = 62

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Blizzak Ice +7
    61
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceIcebear W300
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6657

    Blizzak Ice: 40% × 70 + 60% × 65.9 = 68

    Icebear W300: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 56.9 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Icebear W300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 77

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceIcebear W300
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests84–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Blizzak Ice: 60% × 83.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 77

    No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak Ice. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Blizzak Ice +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceIcebear W300
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6757

    Blizzak Ice: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 67

    Icebear W300: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak Ice. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Icebear W300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    Blizzak Ice +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceIcebear W300
    Reviews found online6561
  8. 48

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak IceIcebear W300
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests48–
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak Ice vs Hankook Icebear W300: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak IceHankook Icebear W300
Relative Score 62 62
Dry 65 62
Wet 53 62
Snow 62 –
Comfort 68 61
Noise 77 –
Treadwear 67 61
Handling (owners) 65 61
Efficiency 48 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blizzak Ice

± 8

Icebear W300

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak Ice

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Icebear W300

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and mobility in deep and compacted snow
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
  • High value-to-performance ratio in winter conditions

Cons

  • Weak performance in wet and slushy conditions
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly in warmer temperatures
  • Limited dry-weather feedback and handling precision
All owner themes in the Icebear W300 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak Ice B · Hankook Icebear W300
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available60—
Rim diameters13″ – 19″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak Ice

Hankook Icebear W300

Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak Ice and Hankook Icebear W300 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak Ice is stronger on comfort, treadwear and dry. Hankook Icebear W300 is stronger on wet. Hankook Icebear W300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Icebear W300 scores 62 vs 53 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Blizzak Ice scores 68 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Blizzak Ice scores 67 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Blizzak Ice scores 65 vs 62 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak Ice
Tire B · Hankook Icebear W300

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak Ice or Icebear W300?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak Ice or Icebear W300?

Hankook Icebear W300, 62 vs 53 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak Ice or Icebear W300?

Bridgestone Blizzak Ice, 65 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak Ice or Icebear W300?

Bridgestone Blizzak Ice, 68 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak Ice or Icebear W300?

Bridgestone Blizzak Ice, 67 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology