Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 5 reviews
Hankook Dynapro M/T looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Hankook Icebear W300 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro M/T vs Hankook Icebear W300 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro M/T leads, 66–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Dynapro M/T +462Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Icebear W300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 65 58 Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
Icebear W300: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 62
No road tests of dry for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Icebear W300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
68
Wet
Dynapro M/T +662Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Icebear W300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 67 59 Dynapro M/T: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
Icebear W300: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62
No road tests of wet for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Icebear W300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Icebear W300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) – Reviews found online 69 – Dynapro M/T: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 70
No road tests of snow for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
59
Comfort
Icebear W300 +261Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Icebear W300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 54 57 Dynapro M/T: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 53.8 = 59
Icebear W300: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 56.9 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro M/T or Icebear W300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Dynapro M/T +561Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Icebear W300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 66 57 Dynapro M/T: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 66
Icebear W300: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro M/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Icebear W300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Level61Why this score
Source Dynapro M/T Icebear W300 Reviews found online 61 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro M/T | Hankook Icebear W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 62 |
| Dry | 66 | 62 |
| Wet | 68 | 62 |
| Snow | 70 | – |
| Comfort | 59 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Dynapro M/T
62
/ 100
Icebear W300
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro M/T
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and overall mileage considering heavy use
- Surprisingly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Strong dry and off-road traction, often reducing the need for 4WD
Cons
- Severe loss of wet traction and dangerous slip/understeer tendencies as the rubber compound hardens over time
- Prone to slow punctures on the running surface under heavy loads
- Develops uneven wear patterns over extended high-mileage use
Tire B Icebear W300
Pros
- Outstanding traction and mobility in deep and compacted snow
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
- High value-to-performance ratio in winter conditions
Cons
- Weak performance in wet and slushy conditions
- Rapid tread wear, particularly in warmer temperatures
- Limited dry-weather feedback and handling precision
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro M/T | B · Hankook Icebear W300 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mud-Terrain tire | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro M/T
62
/ 100
Hankook Icebear W300
Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro M/T — better wet, treadwear and dry. Where the Hankook Icebear W300 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Hankook Dynapro M/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Icebear W300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 68 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Dynapro M/T scores 66 vs 62 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro M/T
Tire B · Hankook Icebear W300
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro M/T or Icebear W300?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro M/T or Icebear W300?
Hankook Dynapro M/T, 68 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro M/T or Icebear W300?
Hankook Dynapro M/T, 66 vs 62 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro M/T or Icebear W300?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 61 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro M/T or Icebear W300?
Hankook Dynapro M/T, 66 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology