Hankook Icebear W300 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Hankook Icebear W300 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 10 + 2,571 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 83–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Icebear W300
Tire AHankook

Icebear W300

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 10 reviews

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2 SUV

All Season

± 5

Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 83 · 2,571 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“I also live in Michigan and we get plenty of all four seasons. I put CC2s on my 2017 RAV4 Hybrid. They have handled all weather conditions up to and including moderate snow with aplomb. If I had to buy new tires tomorrow, I'd get another set.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +25
    87
    Why this score
    SourceIcebear W300CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 64 (est.)86
    Reviews found online5889

    Icebear W300: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 62

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.8 + 40% × 88.7 = 87

    No road tests of dry for Icebear W300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 62

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +22
    84
    Why this score
    SourceIcebear W300CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 64 (est.)84
    Reviews found online5985

    Icebear W300: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 84 + 40% × 84.8 = 84

    No road tests of wet for Icebear W300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    91
    Why this score
    SourceIcebear W300CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–98
    Reviews found online–80

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.6 + 40% × 80.4 = 91

  4. 61

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +25
    86
    Why this score
    SourceIcebear W300CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 67 (est.)82
    Reviews found online5788

    Icebear W300: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 56.9 = 61

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 82.3 + 60% × 88.3 = 86

    No road tests of comfort for Icebear W300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    SourceIcebear W300CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–83
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 77

    No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 61

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceIcebear W300CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5773

    Icebear W300: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61

    CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Icebear W300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 SUV +28
    89
    Why this score
    SourceIcebear W300CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Reviews found online6189
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    87
    Why this score
    SourceIcebear W300CrossClimate 2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–87
Scores at a glance
Hankook Icebear W300 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Icebear W300Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Relative Score 62 83
Dry 62 87
Wet 62 84
Snow – 91
Comfort 61 86
Noise – 77
Treadwear 61 70
Handling (owners) 61 89
Efficiency – 87

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Icebear W300

± 5

CrossClimate 2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Icebear W300

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and mobility in deep and compacted snow
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
  • High value-to-performance ratio in winter conditions

Cons

  • Weak performance in wet and slushy conditions
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly in warmer temperatures
  • Limited dry-weather feedback and handling precision
All owner themes in the Icebear W300 review

Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
  • Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
  • Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
  • Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
  • Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 SUV review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Hankook Icebear W300

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Positive

Community sentiment for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its exceptional grip and safety in snow, slush, and heavy rain. The primary trade-offs frequently cited are reduced fuel/range efficiency—particularly noted by EV owners—along with a premium price tag, directional rotation limitations, and mixed opinions on road noise.

chrforums.uk ·2 upvotes ·2024-06-04

“I have the Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV tyres . The many reviews I read approved of their performance in snowy conditions (if that is an issue where you live) and also their dry condition performance. They supposedly have a decent life span. They felt nicer to drive on than the Primacy tyres . They weren't cheap at about £170 each fitted but will give me some insurance about snowy conditions and will hopefully last until I swap the car in about 3 years.”

r/ModelY ·4 upvotes ·2026-06-01

“New CrossClimate 2 tires almost stranded my family. Massive efficiency drop on Model Y. Just a heads-up for anyone swapping to Michelin CrossClimate 2s. Put a set on my Model Y about 3 weeks ago from Discount Tire and just did a road trip from Denver to Taos, NM with my wife and two toddlers. We charged up to 90% at the Pueblo Supercharger, and the Tesla app estimated we would arrive in Taos with 15% battery remaining. Well, the new tire efficiency hit is incredibly real. The range dropped so fast that we were tracking to hit 0% and had to make an emergency Type 2 charging stop on the way just to make sure we didn't get stranded with the kids in the car. I’m now seriously thinking about taking advantage of Discount Tire's return policy and going back to the OEM Continental ProContact RX. Has anyone else faced similar problems or massive efficiency drops when switching to the CC2s? Does the range eventually get better after a break-in period, or should I just cut my losses and swap back to the Continentals? I need something reliable for road trips with the family, so I'd love to hear your suggestions and experiences!”

r/rav4club ·1 upvote ·2026-10-07

“I also live in Michigan and we get plenty of all four seasons. I put CC2s on my 2017 RAV4 Hybrid. They have handled all weather conditions up to and including moderate snow with aplomb. If I had to buy new tires tomorrow, I'd get another set.”

Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Wet grip and hydroplaning resistance#EV range and fuel efficiency impact#Road noise and ride comfort#High price and premium value#Directional tread rotation limits#Treadwear and longevity

Based on 97 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Icebear W300 B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—35
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook Icebear W300

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Icebear W300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 86 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 84 vs 62 on wet.

Tire A · Hankook Icebear W300
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Icebear W300 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Icebear W300 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Icebear W300 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Icebear W300 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 86 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Icebear W300 or CrossClimate 2 SUV?

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 70 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology