Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 8 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT vs Cooper Discoverer SRX — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 340 owner reviews. How we score
Discoverer SRX leads, 76–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 340 reviews
“I’ve had Cooper Discoverer SRX (all-season) with good experience.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Discoverer SRX +878Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Discoverer SRX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 72 84 Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70
Discoverer SRX: 60% × 74.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.7 = 78
No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Discoverer SRX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
77
Wet
Discoverer SRX +481Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Discoverer SRX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 78 (est.) Reviews found online 80 85 Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 77
Discoverer SRX: 60% × 78.5 (est.) + 40% × 84.9 = 81
No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
No road tests of wet for Discoverer SRX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
75
Snow
Blizzak LM-25 RFT +669Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Discoverer SRX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 78 67 Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 75
Discoverer SRX: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 69
No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Discoverer SRX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Discoverer SRX +574Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Discoverer SRX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 69 77 Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 69.4 = 69
Discoverer SRX: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 76.7 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer SRX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Discoverer SRX Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 74 Discoverer SRX: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 69
No road tests of noise for Discoverer SRX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Level70Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Discoverer SRX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 72 73 Blizzak LM-25 RFT: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
Discoverer SRX: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM-25 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Discoverer SRX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Discoverer SRX +876Why this score
Source Blizzak LM-25 RFT Discoverer SRX Reviews found online 68 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT | Cooper Discoverer SRX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 76 |
| Dry | 70 | 78 |
| Wet | 77 | 81 |
| Snow | 75 | 69 |
| Comfort | 69 | 74 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Blizzak LM-25 RFT
76
/ 100
Discoverer SRX
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep, fresh, or compacted snow and ice
- Transforms rear-wheel-drive vehicles into capable winter drivers
- Softer, quieter, and more comfortable ride compared to standard summer run-flat tires
Cons
- Longer braking distances on dry roads when temperatures rise above freezing
- Reduced braking performance and handling when temperatures exceed 20 degrees Celsius
- Prone to ABS and ESP activation on slick ice surfaces
Tire B Discoverer SRX
Pros
- Exceptional wet and winter weather traction (rain, slush, and snow)
- Smooth and comfortable highway ride quality
- Low road noise levels compared to stock or competing tires
Cons
- Some users reported higher-than-average road noise or humming
- Occasional tendency to wander or track on grooved pavement
- A few reports of shorter tread life than advertised by isolated users
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Cooper Discoverer SRX
Community sentiment for the Cooper Discoverer SRX is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers consistently highlighting its quiet ride, comfortable handling, and dependable all-season traction. Many users report unexpectedly competent performance in light snow and winter conditions, along with favorable pricing compared to competitors like Michelin. Tread life feedback is generally solid, though at least one owner noted shorter longevity than expected.
r/KiaTelluride
·1 upvote ·2022-07-27
“I’ve had Cooper Discoverer SRX (all-season) with good experience.”
expeditionforum.com
·1 upvote ·2025-03-21
“We'd gotten Coopers on Wife's vehicle and were impressed, so I tried Discoverer SRX 245/65/R17 on our Honda Ridgeline truck and they were (and remain) a revelation at least in that they made a huge difference in quieting the road noise. This was 7 years ago and now 30,000+ miles later they still look as new with little noticeable tread wear. Dunno the HTP or ATP II versions but imo Coopers are/can be first-rate tires.”
jeepgarage.org
·2016-02-09
“I just put the Cooper SRX on my 2013 Overland, nice and quiet so far. The snow has been easy too, I don't foresee having any problems with these tires, glad I got them.”
Top themes
#quiet and comfortable ride#winter and snow traction#treadwear and longevity#value and pricing#all-season performance#comparison to Michelin Defender
Based on 28 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT | B · Cooper Discoverer SRX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 3 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10 - 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 600 - 740 A A - B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
76
/ 100
Cooper Discoverer SRX
Narrow edge: Cooper Discoverer SRX — better dry, handling and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT if snow matters most to you. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Cooper Discoverer SRX scores 78 vs 70 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Cooper Discoverer SRX scores 76 vs 68 on handling.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT scores 75 vs 69 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Cooper Discoverer SRX scores 74 vs 69 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT
Tire B · Cooper Discoverer SRX
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer SRX?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer SRX?
Cooper Discoverer SRX, 81 vs 77 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer SRX?
Cooper Discoverer SRX, 78 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer SRX?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 RFT, 75 vs 69 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer SRX?
Cooper Discoverer SRX, 74 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM-25 RFT or Discoverer SRX?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology