tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 21 + 94 owner reviews. How we score

Scorpion All Terrain Plus is ahead, 73–65

Check price on Amazon · Scorpion All Terrain Plus or Blizzak LM-32 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Scorpion All Terrain Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6373

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 65

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Scorpion All Terrain Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus +13
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Scorpion All Terrain Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online6481

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus: 60% × 76.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.8 = 78

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Scorpion All Terrain Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 66

    Snow

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Scorpion All Terrain Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6376

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 66

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Scorpion All Terrain Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus +10
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Scorpion All Terrain Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5872

    Blizzak LM-32: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 61

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.6 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Scorpion All Terrain Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 64

    Noise

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Scorpion All Terrain Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5967

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 64

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM-32 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Scorpion All Terrain Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)67
    Reviews found online6670

    Blizzak LM-32: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus: 60% × 66.9 + 40% × 69.9 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM-32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 59

    Handling (owners)

    Scorpion All Terrain Plus +16
    75
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-32Scorpion All Terrain Plus
    Reviews found online5975
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-32Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus
Relative Score 65 73
Dry 65 71
Wet 65 78
Snow 66 73
Comfort 61 71
Noise 64 67
Treadwear 66 68
Handling (owners) 59 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Blizzak LM-32

± 8

Scorpion All Terrain Plus

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM-32Scorpion All Terrain PlusΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/10 2014 AMS Winter Tyre Test #7/7 2025 Autobild Pirelli All-Terrain Tire Test R19 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-32

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and reliability in deep snow and winter storms
  • Stable and satisfying handling on cold, dry roads
  • Good resistance to aquaplaning and solid durability/tread life reported by some users

Cons

  • Poor and unpredictable wet weather grip, leading to wheel spin and sliding
  • Noticeable road noise and humming that increases as the tread wears down
  • Vague steering feel and lackluster performance under quick acceleration
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM-32 review

Tire B Scorpion All Terrain Plus

Pros

  • Exceptional wet, mud, and winter/snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake certified)
  • Surprisingly quiet and smooth ride on the highway compared to aggressive competitors
  • Aggressive, attractive sidewall and tread styling that enhances vehicle appearance

Cons

  • Some users reported persistent balancing issues or vibrations at highway speeds
  • A few drivers noted increased road noise or uneven shoulder wear as the tires aged
  • Minor reduction in fuel economy reported by some truck and SUV owners
All owner themes in the Scorpion All Terrain Plus review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 B · Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus
CategoryWinterAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3629
Rim diameters15″ – 20″16″ – 20″
Tread depth11/32″12 - 16/32″
UTQG—640 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure50 psi44 - 80 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus

Winner: Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus scores 75 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus scores 78 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus scores 71 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus scores 73 vs 66 on snow.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM-32 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM-32 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?

Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus, 78 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM-32 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?

Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus, 71 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM-32 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?

Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus, 73 vs 66 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM-32 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?

Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus, 67 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM-32 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?

Pirelli Scorpion All Terrain Plus, 71 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM-32 or Scorpion All Terrain Plus?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology