Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT vs Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTDueler H/L Alenza Plus
    Reviews found online–76
  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTDueler H/L Alenza Plus
    Reviews found online–74
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTDueler H/L Alenza Plus
    Reviews found online–68
  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTDueler H/L Alenza Plus
    Reviews found online–75
  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTDueler H/L Alenza Plus
    Reviews found online–72
  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTDueler H/L Alenza Plus
    Professional tests (TWG score)–70
    Reviews found online–74
  7. –

    Handling

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTDueler H/L Alenza Plus
    Reviews found online–72
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT vs Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFTBridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
Relative Score – 72
Dry – 73
Wet – 73
Snow – 69
Comfort – 72
Noise – 69
Treadwear – 71
Handling – 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Blizzak LM-60 RFT

Dueler H/L Alenza Plus

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-60 RFT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Dueler H/L Alenza Plus

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Very low road noise and smooth ride quality
  • Strong handling and stability on dry pavement

Cons

  • Potential for reduced traction on wet surfaces
  • Occasional reports of slight decreases in fuel economy
  • Mixed feedback regarding performance in heavy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Dueler H/L Alenza Plus review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT B · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available23
Rim diameters17″ – 18″17″ – 20″
Tread depth11/32″13/32″
UTQG—800 A A
Treadwear warranty—80,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus

Only Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT
Tire B · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.