Head-to-head Updated

Continental WinterContact TS 860 S vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinterContact TS 860 SBlizzak LM-60 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)72–
    Reviews found online77–
  2. 73

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinterContact TS 860 SBlizzak LM-60 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)69–
    Reviews found online79–
  3. 73

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinterContact TS 860 SBlizzak LM-60 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)70–
    Reviews found online78–
  4. 74

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinterContact TS 860 SBlizzak LM-60 RFT
    Reviews found online79–
  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinterContact TS 860 SBlizzak LM-60 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)73–
    Reviews found online71–
  6. 72

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinterContact TS 860 SBlizzak LM-60 RFT
    Reviews found online76–
  7. 81

    Handling

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceWinterContact TS 860 SBlizzak LM-60 RFT
    Reviews found online81–
Scores at a glance
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental WinterContact TS 860 SBridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT
Relative Score 74 –
Dry 74 –
Wet 73 –
Snow 73 –
Comfort 74 –
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 72 –
Handling 81 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

WinterContact TS 860 S

Blizzak LM-60 RFT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A WinterContact TS 860 S

Pros

  • Exceptional handling and feedback on dry and wet roads in cold temperatures
  • Strong performance and confidence in snow and icy conditions
  • Stiffer sidewalls compared to predecessors, offering improved cornering stability

Cons

  • Long break-in period required before optimal grip is achieved
  • Potential for traction control interference on staggered RWD setups due to circumference variances
  • Limited lateral grip in wet conditions compared to some competitors
All owner themes in the WinterContact TS 860 S review

Tire B Blizzak LM-60 RFT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental WinterContact TS 860 S B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT
CategoryWinter—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available922
Rim diameters16″ – 23″17″ – 18″
Tread depth10 - 11/32″11/32″
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental WinterContact TS 860 S

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT

Only Continental WinterContact TS 860 S has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.