Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT vs Continental WinterContact TS 860 S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTWinterContact TS 860 S
    Professional tests (TWG score)–72
    Reviews found online–77
  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTWinterContact TS 860 S
    Professional tests (TWG score)–69
    Reviews found online–79
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTWinterContact TS 860 S
    Professional tests (TWG score)–70
    Reviews found online–78
  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTWinterContact TS 860 S
    Reviews found online–79
  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTWinterContact TS 860 S
    Professional tests (TWG score)–73
    Reviews found online–71
  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTWinterContact TS 860 S
    Reviews found online–76
  7. –

    Handling

    No comparison
    81
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM-60 RFTWinterContact TS 860 S
    Reviews found online–81
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT vs Continental WinterContact TS 860 S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFTContinental WinterContact TS 860 S
Relative Score – 74
Dry – 74
Wet – 73
Snow – 73
Comfort – 74
Noise – 72
Treadwear – 72
Handling – 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Blizzak LM-60 RFT

WinterContact TS 860 S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM-60 RFT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B WinterContact TS 860 S

Pros

  • Exceptional handling and feedback on dry and wet roads in cold temperatures
  • Strong performance and confidence in snow and icy conditions
  • Stiffer sidewalls compared to predecessors, offering improved cornering stability

Cons

  • Long break-in period required before optimal grip is achieved
  • Potential for traction control interference on staggered RWD setups due to circumference variances
  • Limited lateral grip in wet conditions compared to some competitors
All owner themes in the WinterContact TS 860 S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT B · Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
Category—Winter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available292
Rim diameters17″ – 18″16″ – 23″
Tread depth11/32″10 - 11/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure44 psi50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT

Continental WinterContact TS 860 S

Only Continental WinterContact TS 860 S has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-60 RFT
Tire B · Continental WinterContact TS 860 S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.