tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 7 + 1,072 owner reviews. How we score

Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 78–62

Check price on Amazon · Agilis CrossClimate or Blizzak LM25 4X4 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Tire BMichelin

Agilis CrossClimate

All Season

± 6

Tests 72 · 3 tests Owners 85 · 1,072 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Agilis CrossClimate +16
    79
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 65 (est.)74
    Reviews found online6087

    Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 63

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 87 = 79

    No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 60

    Wet

    Agilis CrossClimate +18
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 62 (est.)71
    Reviews found online5688

    Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 60

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 87.8 = 78

    No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Snow

    Agilis CrossClimate +11
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 69 (est.)76
    Reviews found online6582

    Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 81.6 = 78

    No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Agilis CrossClimate +17
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)55
    Reviews found online4781

    Blizzak LM25 4X4: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 47.2 = 54

    Agilis CrossClimate: 40% × 54.8 + 60% × 81.1 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 60

    Noise

    Agilis CrossClimate +16
    76
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)82
    Reviews found online49≈ 66 (est.)

    Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.4 = 60

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 82 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76

    No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Agilis CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    Agilis CrossClimate +16
    78
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5985

    Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 62

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 78

    No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 60

    Handling (owners)

    Agilis CrossClimate +21
    81
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Agilis CrossClimate
    Reviews found online6081
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceBlizzak LM25 4X4Agilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–71
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Relative Score 62 78
Dry 63 79
Wet 60 78
Snow 67 78
Comfort 54 71
Noise 60 76
Treadwear 62 78
Handling (owners) 60 81
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Blizzak LM25 4X4

± 6

Agilis CrossClimate

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryBlizzak LM25 4X4Agilis CrossClimateΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/8 2010 Auto Bild Winter 4x4 Tyre Test #2/6 promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Blizzak LM25 4X4

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and severe winter conditions
  • Good stability and control on dry and mixed winter roads
  • Sporty handling feel and low noise in dry weather

Cons

  • Extremely slippery performance on wet and cold roads
  • High noise levels reported by some users
  • Potential performance reduction if tires are aged during storage before installation
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM25 4X4 review

Tire B Agilis CrossClimate

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling

Cons

  • Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
  • Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
  • A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
All owner themes in the Agilis CrossClimate review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.

vwcaliforniaclub.com ·5 upvotes ·2024-07-02

“I fitted these to our 680 Michelin Agilis Crossclimate 235/60 R17C 117/115R 8PR, 3PMSF And they work well, better off tarmac (Grassy muddy farm track) than the factory tyres and felt better in heavy rain. I can’t recall if ride quality changed tho.”
r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2026-10-05

“Costco tire employee here- It can be hard to estimate tire life w/out warranty info. Most members see about 60k miles on the agilis crossclimate and 75k on the defender ltx. The agilis is the better tire for heavy loading but you have to balance that against how fast you'll wear them out. Both are great tires though”
f150forum.com

“I bought a set of Agilis for my 2017 F250 King Ranch two years ago. I live in Colorado and I was attracted to the idea that they could possibly be left on year round and not have to swap between summer and winter tires. I have swapped between summer and winter tires for the past 25 years here in Colorado and I have tried tires that were supposedly "ALL SEASON" but they were always a compromise, not great in the summer and as a highway tire and not great in the winter as a snow or ice tire. The Agilis has been the only tire that has great summer performance, quiet and nice handling and also it has been hard to believe, but they act pretty close to Blizzaks I've had in the past for winter driving. I have 25,000 miles on them and they are wearing very well, and have not become noisy. I'm surprised there are not more accolades on these tires. They came out on top vs several other all season tires.”
Top themes
#Heavy load capability#Winter and snow traction#Tread wear longevity#Defender LTX comparison#C-metric recall notice#Ride comfort and noise#Van and RV use

Based on 54 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Van
Sizes available422
Rim diameters17″ – 19″15″ – 17″
Tread depth11/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 81 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 71 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 79 vs 63 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 79 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 67 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 76 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 71 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology