Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 7 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 vs Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 7 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Winter i*pike RS2 is ahead, 69–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 5 tests Owners 73 · 5 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Blizzak LM25 4X4 +756Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 49 Reviews found online 60 66 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 63
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 49.2 + 40% × 65.9 = 56
No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
60
Wet
Winter i*pike RS2 +1373Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 56 76 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 60
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 71 + 40% × 75.7 = 73
No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
Winter i*pike RS2 +976Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 65 76 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 75.9 + 40% × 76.4 = 76
No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
54
Comfort
Winter i*pike RS2 +1872Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 47 68 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 47.2 = 54
Winter i*pike RS2: 40% × 79.3 + 60% × 67.6 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Noise
Blizzak LM25 4X4 +159Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 55 Reviews found online 49 ≈ 66 (est.) Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.4 = 60
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 54.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 59
No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i*pike RS2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
62
Treadwear
Winter i*pike RS2 +1072Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 59 75 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 62
Winter i*pike RS2: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Winter i*pike RS2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
60
Handling (owners)
Winter i*pike RS2 +1272Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Winter i*pike RS2 Reviews found online 60 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison73Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 69 |
| Dry | 63 | 56 |
| Wet | 60 | 73 |
| Snow | 67 | 76 |
| Comfort | 54 | 72 |
| Noise | 60 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak LM25 4X4
Winter i*pike RS2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Winter i*pike RS2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/8 2010 Auto Bild Winter 4x4 Tyre Test | #6/8 2023 Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak LM25 4X4
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and severe winter conditions
- Good stability and control on dry and mixed winter roads
- Sporty handling feel and low noise in dry weather
Cons
- Extremely slippery performance on wet and cold roads
- High noise levels reported by some users
- Potential performance reduction if tires are aged during storage before installation
Tire B Winter i*pike RS2
Pros
- Exceptional traction and braking on snow and ice
- Strong side grip and predictable cornering limits
- High durability with secure stud retention over multiple years
Cons
- Poor steering feedback on dry tarmac
- Noticeable understeer in dry road conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 | B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
Winner: Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 if dry matters most to you. Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 72 vs 54 on comfort.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 73 vs 60 on wet.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 72 vs 60 on handling.
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 72 vs 62 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Winter i*pike RS2?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Winter i*pike RS2?
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 73 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Winter i*pike RS2?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4, 63 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Winter i*pike RS2?
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 76 vs 67 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Winter i*pike RS2?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 59 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Winter i*pike RS2?
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 72 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or Winter i*pike RS2?
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2, 72 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology