tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 76–64

Check price on Amazon · Agilis CrossClimate or Blizzak LM25 4X4 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AMichelin

Agilis CrossClimate

All Season

Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 81 · 1,066 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 7 in 2020 Promobil Commercial All-Season Tire Test R16 (overall ranking)

“Anyone tried Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tires on a Bolt? Following the info from I have picked up some used 15" Sonic wheels for winter use here in Maine. I can get Michelin Ice snow tires in an equivalent 15" size (to match the circumference of the stock tire/wheel) but not Cross Climate 2s. However, this Agilis is available in a near equivalent. It appears to be a heavier tire designed primarily for delivery vans Google AI suggests it has a slightly higher rolling resistance to the CC2s, which many report to have about a 10% hit on range - although any new tire will be less efficient than a well-worn one, so we should take that info with a grain of salt The Michelin Energy Saver tires are obviously more efficient, but also rated poor for use in snow. I'm a bit torn between "proper" snow tires and the Agilis, which I could run all year round One other factor is that smaller wheels tend to be more efficient - to a noticeable extent on EVs, so it just might be a wash as far as efficiency goes Read more”

Tire BBridgestone

Blizzak LM25 4X4

Winter

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 5 reviews

Best test result: #7 of 8 in 2010 Auto Bild Winter 4x4 Tyre Test (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Agilis CrossClimate +11
    66
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateBlizzak LM25 4X4
    Professional tests (TWG score)71–
    Reviews found online8565
  2. 77

    Wet

    Agilis CrossClimate +15
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateBlizzak LM25 4X4
    Professional tests (TWG score)71–
    Reviews found online8460
  3. 76

    Snow

    Agilis CrossClimate +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateBlizzak LM25 4X4
    Professional tests (TWG score)75–
    Reviews found online7969
  4. 74

    Comfort

    Agilis CrossClimate +12
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateBlizzak LM25 4X4
    Reviews found online7956
  5. 74

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateBlizzak LM25 4X4
    Professional tests (TWG score)73–
    Reviews found online76–
  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Agilis CrossClimate +9
    63
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateBlizzak LM25 4X4
    Reviews found online7762
  7. 80

    Handling

    Agilis CrossClimate +18
    62
    Why this score
    SourceAgilis CrossClimateBlizzak LM25 4X4
    Reviews found online8062
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin Agilis CrossClimateBridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
Relative Score 76 64
Dry 77 66
Wet 77 62
Snow 76 69
Comfort 74 62
Noise 74 –
Treadwear 72 63
Handling 80 62

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Agilis CrossClimate

Blizzak LM25 4X4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryAgilis CrossClimateBlizzak LM25 4X4ΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 67% #3/7 · 2020 Promobil Commercial All-Season Tire Test R16 14% #7/8 · 2010 Auto Bild Winter 4x4 Tyre Test +52.4 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Agilis CrossClimate

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling

Cons

  • Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
  • Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
  • A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
All owner themes in the Agilis CrossClimate review

Tire B Blizzak LM25 4X4

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and climbing ability in deep snow and challenging winter conditions.
  • Impressive long-term durability and sidewall integrity over extended periods.
  • Stable and sporty handling characteristics on dry pavement.

Cons

  • Reports of excessive road noise during operation.
  • Inconsistent performance on wet or cold surfaces, with some users noting a lack of grip.
  • Sensitivity to rubber aging, which can significantly degrade performance if tires are not fresh.
All owner themes in the Blizzak LM25 4X4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.

r/Cartalk ·1 upvote ·2025-04-09

“Agilis Crossclimate vs Agilis LTX as a summer tire for a pickup? Daily driver Chevy 3/4 ton pickup. I've got a set of winter tires that I run from Nov-Mar but I need to replace my summer tires. Mediterranean climate, so dry summers. 99% of my driving is city/highway, maybe 1-5 days per year on dry dirt roads. I'd like to go with the crossclimate since they're about $200 cheaper for the set. I guess the Defender LTX just got rebranded Agilis LTX. I know the Defender LTX is a very popular light truck tire. Y'all think I can get away with the crossclimate and save a couple hundred bucks? Read more”
f150forum.com

“I spoke with Michelin technical support this morning. The company has not conducted any testing on this tire on 1/2 ton trucks or full-size SUVs. I opted to bypass the tire and purchased Michelin Defender LTX M/S in LT285/70R17. I had high hopes of getting inproved winter weather performance for the few snow days in my area each year, but it wasn't worth the gamble for potentially a low mileage & costly tire.”
r/Finland ·2024-10-16

“Lapland - Tyre Advice - Michelin Agilis Crossclimate Grateful for the knowledge/experience of the good people of r/Finland . I ordinarily use studded tyres for my van, but planning a roadtrip down to Germany/France over the new year (so can't fit these). I've no experience with friction tyres on snow/ice, but have Michelin Agilis Crossclimate [ . These have the 3PMSF marking so I understand are technically legal in Finland for winter, but I'm not sure about safety/performance in Lapland (route being: Tornio, to Sweden and then down via Denmark.) Good to hear people's views, or if you've experience with these types of tyres in this environment? UPDATE: Really appreciate the comments and views put forward on this. By the debate it seems I’m not alone in being not clear about winter performance of a tyre rated 3PMSF but not a “true” Nordic friction tyre. It does not make economic sense to buy new winter friction tyres for a road trip. So thinking about packing the Michelins, driving the studded tyre and getting them swapped/stored in Denmark or South Sweden and then swapping back on return. A pain in ass, a waste of space but the least risky approach. If anyone’s done similar let me know your experience.”
Top themes
#Heavy load capability#Winter and snow traction#Tread wear longevity#Defender LTX comparison#C-metric recall notice#Ride comfort and noise#Van and RV use

Based on 54 community posts

Tire B

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
CategoryAll SeasonWinter
Vehicle typeVanSUV and 4x4
Sizes available224
Rim diameters15″ – 17″17″ – 19″

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4

Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 80 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 77 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 74 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 77 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

76

Leads

Agilis CrossClimate

Amazon