Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 7 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 vs Michelin X Ice Snow — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 7 + 20 owner reviews. How we score
X Ice Snow is ahead, 73–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (comfort (tester's mark))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
X Ice Snow +467Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 X Ice Snow Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 60 71 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 63
X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 70.7 = 67
No road tests of dry for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
60
Wet
X Ice Snow +1171Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 X Ice Snow Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 56 79 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 60
X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 79.2 = 71
No road tests of wet for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Snow
X Ice Snow +976Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 X Ice Snow Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 65 81 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67
X Ice Snow: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 81.1 = 76
No road tests of snow for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
54
Comfort
X Ice Snow +2680Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 X Ice Snow Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 47 79 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 47.2 = 54
X Ice Snow: 40% × 81 + 60% × 78.8 = 80
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Noise
X Ice Snow +1575Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 X Ice Snow Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 49 ≈ 66 (est.) Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.4 = 60
X Ice Snow: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 75
No road tests of noise for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for X Ice Snow. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
62
Treadwear
X Ice Snow +1476Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 X Ice Snow Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 59 81 Blizzak LM25 4X4: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 62
X Ice Snow: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.4 = 76
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak LM25 4X4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for X Ice Snow. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
60
Handling (owners)
X Ice Snow +1575Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 X Ice Snow Reviews found online 60 75 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison77Why this score
Source Blizzak LM25 4X4 X Ice Snow Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests – 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 | Michelin X Ice Snow |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 73 |
| Dry | 63 | 67 |
| Wet | 60 | 71 |
| Snow | 67 | 76 |
| Comfort | 54 | 80 |
| Noise | 60 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 76 |
| Handling (owners) | 60 | 75 |
| Efficiency | – | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak LM25 4X4
X Ice Snow
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak LM25 4X4 | X Ice Snow | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/8 2010 Auto Bild Winter 4x4 Tyre Test | #7/10 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak LM25 4X4
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and severe winter conditions
- Good stability and control on dry and mixed winter roads
- Sporty handling feel and low noise in dry weather
Cons
- Extremely slippery performance on wet and cold roads
- High noise levels reported by some users
- Potential performance reduction if tires are aged during storage before installation
Tire B X Ice Snow
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow, packed snow, and slush
- High confidence and predictable handling on icy and freezing roads
- Impressive tread wear longevity and minimal wear over multiple seasons
Cons
- Average performance on dry and wet pavement compared to dedicated non-winter tires
- Slightly noisier on dry pavement as the tread wears down
- Can feel slightly twitchy at the limit or less comfortable than older X-Ice generations
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 | B · Michelin X Ice Snow |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 100 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 19″ | 13″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4
Michelin X Ice Snow
Winner: Michelin X Ice Snow — better comfort, noise and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 4X4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin X Ice Snow scores 80 vs 54 on comfort.
Michelin X Ice Snow scores 75 vs 60 on noise.
Michelin X Ice Snow scores 75 vs 60 on handling.
Michelin X Ice Snow scores 76 vs 62 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak LM25 4X4 or X Ice Snow?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or X Ice Snow?
Michelin X Ice Snow, 71 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or X Ice Snow?
Michelin X Ice Snow, 67 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or X Ice Snow?
Michelin X Ice Snow, 76 vs 67 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or X Ice Snow?
Michelin X Ice Snow, 75 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or X Ice Snow?
Michelin X Ice Snow, 80 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak LM25 4X4 or X Ice Snow?
Michelin X Ice Snow, 76 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology