Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 68 · 2 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test (noise)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 2 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Destination A/T2 is ahead, 73–67
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 68 · 2 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test (noise)
Tests – · 1 test Owners 73 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Blizzak LM80 EVO | Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 64 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 70 |
Blizzak LM80 EVO: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 70.6 = 66
Destination A/T2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69
No road tests of dry for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Blizzak LM80 EVO | Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 63 | ≈ 76 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 81 |
Blizzak LM80 EVO: 60% × 62.6 + 40% × 67.3 = 64
Destination A/T2: 60% × 76.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.8 = 78
No road tests of wet for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Blizzak LM80 EVO | Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 71 (est.) | 75 |
Blizzak LM80 EVO: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 71.2 (est.) = 72
Destination A/T2: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 73
No owner ratings of snow for Blizzak LM80 EVO. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Blizzak LM80 EVO | Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 74 |
Blizzak LM80 EVO: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.9 = 65
Destination A/T2: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.8 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Blizzak LM80 EVO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Blizzak LM80 EVO | Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 72 |
Blizzak LM80 EVO: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72
Destination A/T2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 69
No owner ratings of noise for Blizzak LM80 EVO. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for Destination A/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Blizzak LM80 EVO | Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | – | 71 |
| Reviews found online | – | 69 |
Destination A/T2: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 69 = 70
| Source | Blizzak LM80 EVO | Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 66 | 72 |
| Source | Blizzak LM80 EVO | Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 67 | – |
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO | Firestone Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 73 |
| Dry | 66 | 69 |
| Wet | 64 | 78 |
| Snow | 72 | 73 |
| Comfort | 65 | 72 |
| Noise | 72 | 69 |
| Treadwear | – | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 67 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak LM80 EVO
Destination A/T2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak LM80 EVO | Destination A/T2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/9 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | #9/18 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO | B · Firestone Destination A/T2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 34 | 33 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 540 - 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 55,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 8 | 8 |
Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO
Firestone Destination A/T2
Winner: Firestone Destination A/T2 — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO if noise matters most to you. Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Firestone Destination A/T2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Firestone Destination A/T2 scores 78 vs 64 on wet.
Firestone Destination A/T2 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.
Firestone Destination A/T2 scores 72 vs 66 on handling.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO scores 72 vs 69 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Firestone Destination A/T2, 78 vs 64 on our wet score.
Firestone Destination A/T2, 69 vs 66 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM80 EVO, 72 vs 69 on our noise score.
Firestone Destination A/T2, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology