Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 63 · 21 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Michelin X-Ice North 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 13 road tests and 21 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
X-Ice North 4 is ahead, 74–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 13 tests Owners 75 · 12 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test (ice traction)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
X-Ice North 4 +376Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 10 tests 85 81 Reviews found online 54 70 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 54.1 = 73
X-Ice North 4: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 69.8 = 76
-
67
Wet
Blizzak WS90 +265Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 12 tests 66 60 Reviews found online 69 74 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 65.6 + 40% × 68.5 = 67
X-Ice North 4: 60% × 59.6 + 40% × 74 = 65
-
73
Snow
X-Ice North 4 +1083Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 11 tests 69 87 Reviews found online 79 77 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 78.5 = 73
X-Ice North 4: 60% × 87.1 + 40% × 77.4 = 83
-
61
Comfort
X-Ice North 4 +1475Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 4 tests 69 76 Reviews found online 55 74 Blizzak WS90: 40% × 68.8 + 60% × 55.2 = 61
X-Ice North 4: 40% × 76 + 60% × 74 = 75
-
63
Noise
Blizzak WS90 +360Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 10 tests 70 55 Reviews found online 51 ≈ 66 (est.) Blizzak WS90: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 51.1 = 63
X-Ice North 4: 60% × 55.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 60
No owner ratings of noise for X-Ice North 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
61
Treadwear
X-Ice North 4 +1374Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 58 79 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61
X-Ice North 4: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 78.8 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for X-Ice North 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
62
Handling (owners)
X-Ice North 4 +1577Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 X-Ice North 4 Reviews found online 62 77 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison60Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests – 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | Michelin X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 74 |
| Dry | 73 | 76 |
| Wet | 67 | 65 |
| Snow | 73 | 83 |
| Comfort | 61 | 75 |
| Noise | 63 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 77 |
| Efficiency | – | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak WS90
X-Ice North 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak WS90 | X-Ice North 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 90% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 95% #6/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 79% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 92% #7/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 81% #9/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 97% #8/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Ice Braking | Snow | 100% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 82% #4/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Ice Traction | Snow | 100% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 80% #3/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 70% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 99% #5/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 85% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 99% #2/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling (tester's mark) | Snow | 55% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 90% #17/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 94% #10/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 50% #13/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 91% #8/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 60% #5/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Road Rating (tester's mark) | Other | 79% #9/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 60% #13/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/10 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | #3/6 2027 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak WS90
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
- Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
- Strong capability in slush and deep snow
Cons
- Increased road noise during highway driving
- Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
- Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
Tire B X-Ice North 4
Pros
- Outstanding grip and traction on ice and snow
- Significantly lower road noise compared to competing studded tires
- Comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Premature stud loss reported by some users over multiple seasons
- Slightly slippery feel on rain and dry concrete
- Light studs can struggle to penetrate loose snow sitting on top of hard ice
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | B · Michelin X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 45 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Michelin X-Ice North 4
Winner: Michelin X-Ice North 4 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 if noise matters most to you.
Michelin X-Ice North 4 scores 77 vs 62 on handling.
Michelin X-Ice North 4 scores 75 vs 61 on comfort.
Michelin X-Ice North 4 scores 74 vs 61 on treadwear.
Michelin X-Ice North 4 scores 83 vs 73 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak WS90 or X-Ice North 4?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak WS90 or X-Ice North 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak WS90 or X-Ice North 4?
Michelin X-Ice North 4, 76 vs 73 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak WS90 or X-Ice North 4?
Michelin X-Ice North 4, 83 vs 73 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Blizzak WS90 or X-Ice North 4?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 63 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak WS90 or X-Ice North 4?
Michelin X-Ice North 4, 75 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak WS90 or X-Ice North 4?
Michelin X-Ice North 4, 74 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology