Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 63 · 21 reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 8 road tests and 21 + 13 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Blizzak WS90 and Hakkapeliitta 10 are level at 68.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 65 · 8 tests Owners 71 · 13 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (snow handling (tester's mark))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Blizzak WS90 +1063Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Hakkapeliitta 10 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 6 tests 85 62 Reviews found online 54 65 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 54.1 = 73
Hakkapeliitta 10: 60% × 61.5 + 40% × 65.3 = 63
-
67
Wet
Blizzak WS90 +760Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Hakkapeliitta 10 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests 66 52 Reviews found online 69 72 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 65.6 + 40% × 68.5 = 67
Hakkapeliitta 10: 60% × 51.6 + 40% × 72.4 = 60
-
73
Snow
Hakkapeliitta 10 +1487Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Hakkapeliitta 10 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests 69 92 Reviews found online 79 79 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 78.6 = 73
Hakkapeliitta 10: 60% × 92.4 + 40% × 79.3 = 87
-
61
Comfort
Blizzak WS90 +160Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Hakkapeliitta 10 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests 69 57 Reviews found online 55 62 Blizzak WS90: 40% × 68.8 + 60% × 55.2 = 61
Hakkapeliitta 10: 40% × 57.4 + 60% × 61.8 = 60
-
63
Noise
Blizzak WS90 +1152Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Hakkapeliitta 10 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests 70 40 Reviews found online 51 71 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 51.1 = 63
Hakkapeliitta 10: 60% × 40 + 40% × 70.6 = 52
-
61
Treadwear
Hakkapeliitta 10 +768Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Hakkapeliitta 10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 70 Blizzak WS90: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61
Hakkapeliitta 10: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Blizzak WS90. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta 10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Hakkapeliitta 10 +971Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Hakkapeliitta 10 Reviews found online 62 71 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison67Why this score
Source Blizzak WS90 Hakkapeliitta 10 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 68 |
| Dry | 73 | 63 |
| Wet | 67 | 60 |
| Snow | 73 | 87 |
| Comfort | 61 | 60 |
| Noise | 63 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 71 |
| Efficiency | – | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Blizzak WS90
Hakkapeliitta 10
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Blizzak WS90 | Hakkapeliitta 10 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 90% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 95% #5/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 79% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 92% #6/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 81% #9/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 97% #5/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Ice Braking | Snow | 100% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 94% #2/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Ice Traction | Snow | 100% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 86% #2/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 70% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 99% #3/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 85% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 100% #2/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling (tester's mark) | Snow | 55% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 94% #10/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 60% #4/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 91% #8/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 70% #10/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/10 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | #1/10 2025 UTAC Ivalo Studded Winter Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Blizzak WS90
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
- Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
- Strong capability in slush and deep snow
Cons
- Increased road noise during highway driving
- Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
- Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
Tire B Hakkapeliitta 10
Pros
- Outstanding traction and handling on ice and hard-packed snow
- Exceptional performance in deep snow and harsh winter weather
- Considerably quiet for a studded winter tire
Cons
- Steep performance drop-off in snow and ice after roughly 20,000 miles or 2 seasons
- Lower grip and feedback on dry and wet asphalt compared to some studless competitors
- Noticeable spike noise during driving and braking
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 45 | 34 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | 14″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 11.5/32″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 22 | 22 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 and Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 is stronger on noise, dry and wet. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 is stronger on snow, handling and treadwear.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 scores 87 vs 73 on snow.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 63 vs 52 on noise.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 73 vs 63 on dry.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 scores 71 vs 62 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Blizzak WS90 or Hakkapeliitta 10?
Which is better in the wet, Blizzak WS90 or Hakkapeliitta 10?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 67 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Blizzak WS90 or Hakkapeliitta 10?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 73 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Blizzak WS90 or Hakkapeliitta 10?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10, 87 vs 73 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Blizzak WS90 or Hakkapeliitta 10?
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, 63 vs 52 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Blizzak WS90 or Hakkapeliitta 10?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Blizzak WS90 or Hakkapeliitta 10?
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10, 68 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology