tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 8 road tests and 0 + 13 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Hakkapeliitta 01 67, Hakkapeliitta 10 68.

Check price on Amazon · Hakkapeliitta 01 Check price on Amazon · Hakkapeliitta 10
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01
Tire ANokian

Hakkapeliitta 01

Winter tire

± 9

Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners – · none yet

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test (noise (tester's mark))

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
Tire BNokian

Hakkapeliitta 10

Winter

± 6

Tests 65 · 8 tests Owners 71 · 13 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (snow handling (tester's mark))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    Hakkapeliitta 10 +9
    63
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 01Hakkapeliitta 10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 6 tests5062
    Reviews found online≈ 61 (est.)65

    Hakkapeliitta 01: 60% × 50.1 + 40% × 60.6 (est.) = 54

    Hakkapeliitta 10: 60% × 61.5 + 40% × 65.3 = 63

    No owner ratings of dry for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Hakkapeliitta 01 +11
    60
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 01Hakkapeliitta 10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 7 tests7152
    Reviews found online≈ 71 (est.)72

    Hakkapeliitta 01: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 70.6 (est.) = 71

    Hakkapeliitta 10: 60% × 51.6 + 40% × 72.4 = 60

    No owner ratings of wet for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 75

    Snow

    Hakkapeliitta 10 +12
    87
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 01Hakkapeliitta 10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests7792
    Reviews found online≈ 72 (est.)79

    Hakkapeliitta 01: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 72.5 (est.) = 75

    Hakkapeliitta 10: 60% × 92.4 + 40% × 79.2 = 87

    No owner ratings of snow for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    Hakkapeliitta 01 +2
    60
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 01Hakkapeliitta 10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests5657
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)62

    Hakkapeliitta 01: 40% × 56.1 + 60% × 66.1 (est.) = 62

    Hakkapeliitta 10: 40% × 57.4 + 60% × 61.8 = 60

    No owner ratings of comfort for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 75

    Noise

    Hakkapeliitta 01 +23
    52
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 01Hakkapeliitta 10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 7 tests8140
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)71

    Hakkapeliitta 01: 60% × 81.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 75

    Hakkapeliitta 10: 60% × 40 + 40% × 70.6 = 52

    No owner ratings of noise for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 01Hakkapeliitta 10
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online–70

    Hakkapeliitta 10: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta 10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 01Hakkapeliitta 10
    Reviews found online–71
  8. 52

    Efficiency

    Hakkapeliitta 10 +15
    67
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta 01Hakkapeliitta 10
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests5267
Scores at a glance
CategoryNokian Hakkapeliitta 01Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
Relative Score 67 68
Dry 54 63
Wet 71 60
Snow 75 87
Comfort 62 60
Noise 75 52
Treadwear – 68
Handling (owners) – 71
Efficiency 52 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 9

Hakkapeliitta 01

± 6

Hakkapeliitta 10

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryHakkapeliitta 01Hakkapeliitta 10ΔHead-to-head
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 40% #7/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test 89% #11/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 76% #18/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test 85% #7/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #2/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test 96% #12/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 50% #15/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test 89% #11/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Handling Snow 100% #2/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test 100% #1/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Ice Handling (tester's mark) Snow 90% #12/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/20 · 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Traction Snow 81% #2/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test 86% #2/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 100% #1/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test 100% #2/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling (tester's mark) Snow 100% #12/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/20 · 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 96% #6/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test 95% #4/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 40% #16/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test 60% #4/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #1/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test 95% #6/8 · 2024 Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise (tester's mark) Noise 100% #1/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test 70% #10/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 92% #17/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test 96% #9/20 · 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #1/6 2027 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 #1/10 2025 UTAC Ivalo Studded Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hakkapeliitta 01

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Hakkapeliitta 10

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and handling on ice and hard-packed snow
  • Exceptional performance in deep snow and harsh winter weather
  • Considerably quiet for a studded winter tire

Cons

  • Steep performance drop-off in snow and ice after roughly 20,000 miles or 2 seasons
  • Lower grip and feedback on dry and wet asphalt compared to some studless competitors
  • Noticeable spike noise during driving and braking
All owner themes in the Hakkapeliitta 10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
CategoryWinter tireWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available9034
Rim diameters14″ – 22″14″ – 20″
Tread depth11.5/32″11.5/32″
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common2727

Which one should you actually buy?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10

Too close to call: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 and Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 are within 2 points overall. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 is stronger on noise and wet. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 is stronger on efficiency, snow and dry.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 scores 75 vs 52 on noise.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 scores 67 vs 52 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 scores 87 vs 75 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 scores 71 vs 60 on wet.

Tire A · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hakkapeliitta 01 or Hakkapeliitta 10?

Which is better in the wet, Hakkapeliitta 01 or Hakkapeliitta 10?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01, 71 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Hakkapeliitta 01 or Hakkapeliitta 10?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10, 63 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Hakkapeliitta 01 or Hakkapeliitta 10?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10, 87 vs 75 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Hakkapeliitta 01 or Hakkapeliitta 10?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01, 75 vs 52 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Hakkapeliitta 01 or Hakkapeliitta 10?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, Hakkapeliitta 01 or Hakkapeliitta 10?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10, 67 vs 52 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology