Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400 vs Michelin Latitude Tour HP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 26 + 33 owner reviews. How we score

Latitude Tour HP is ahead, 57–49

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 46

    Dry

    Latitude Tour HP +11
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L 400Latitude Tour HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 54 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online3551

    Dueler H/L 400: 60% × 54.3 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 46

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57

    No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L 400. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 54

    Wet

    Latitude Tour HP +4
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L 400Latitude Tour HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online4854

    Dueler H/L 400: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 54

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 58

    No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L 400. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Latitude Tour HP +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L 400Latitude Tour HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4151

    Dueler H/L 400: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.4 = 53

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Dueler H/L 400. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 39

    Comfort

    Latitude Tour HP +19
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L 400Latitude Tour HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online2553

    Dueler H/L 400: 40% × 59.9 (est.) + 60% × 25.2 = 39

    Latitude Tour HP: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.4 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/L 400. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 57

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L 400Latitude Tour HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online43–

    Dueler H/L 400: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 43.4 = 57

    No road tests of noise for Dueler H/L 400. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 46

    Treadwear

    Latitude Tour HP +10
    56
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L 400Latitude Tour HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online3450

    Dueler H/L 400: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 33.8 = 46

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.7 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/L 400. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 45

    Handling (owners)

    Latitude Tour HP +4
    49
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/L 400Latitude Tour HP
    Reviews found online4549
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400 vs Michelin Latitude Tour HP: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Dueler H/L 400Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Relative Score 49 57
Dry 46 57
Wet 54 58
Snow 53 59
Comfort 39 58
Noise 57 –
Treadwear 46 56
Handling (owners) 45 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Dueler H/L 400

± 8

Latitude Tour HP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dueler H/L 400

Pros

  • Comfortable, smooth ride quality often described as quiet or floating
  • Reliable wet and dry traction for daily commuting
  • Good performance in light snow and winter conditions for an OEM all-season tire

Cons

  • Accelerated and uneven tread wear reported by multiple users
  • Increased road noise and harshness as the tires wear down
  • Subpar grip during aggressive cornering or on wet roundabouts
All owner themes in the Dueler H/L 400 review

Tire B Latitude Tour HP

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry-weather handling and steering response
  • High durability and longevity for specific vehicle applications

Cons

  • Premature sidewall cracking and deterioration
  • Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle models
  • Poor traction and predictability in wet or snowy conditions
All owner themes in the Latitude Tour HP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400 B · Michelin Latitude Tour HP
CategoryAll-SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available147
Rim diameters17″ – 21″16″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG400 B B400 - 440 A A
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400

Michelin Latitude Tour HP

Winner: Michelin Latitude Tour HP — better comfort, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 58 vs 39 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 57 vs 46 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 56 vs 46 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 59 vs 53 on snow.

Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L 400
Tire B · Michelin Latitude Tour HP

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dueler H/L 400 or Latitude Tour HP?

Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/L 400 or Latitude Tour HP?

Michelin Latitude Tour HP, 58 vs 54 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/L 400 or Latitude Tour HP?

Michelin Latitude Tour HP, 57 vs 46 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dueler H/L 400 or Latitude Tour HP?

Michelin Latitude Tour HP, 59 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/L 400 or Latitude Tour HP?

Michelin Latitude Tour HP, 58 vs 39 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dueler H/L 400 or Latitude Tour HP?

Michelin Latitude Tour HP, 56 vs 46 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology