All-season tire Updated September 2026

Michelin Latitude Tour HP review

Relative score 60% tests + 40% owners

Owners 55 · 33 reviews analysed Road tests 13 · 2 tests

How scores work
Add your size for an exact match
/R

The Amazon link then searches this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

The Michelin Latitude Tour HP presents a polarized user experience, often praised for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and longevity on specific premium vehicles. However, a significant portion of users report inconsistent tread life, premature sidewall cracking, and disappointing wet-weather performance, leading to a mixed consensus regarding its value proposition.

Owners rate it 41.7 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Michelin Latitude Tour HP

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews found online; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

How scores work
Relative score
0–100. Blends road tests (60%) and owner reviews (40%) category by category, the same way on every TireWheelGuide page. With only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from it, so the score stays closer to average. It needs at least one road test or five owner reviews.
Road tests
0–100 per score, from published tests, newer tests counting more. Each result is compared with every other tire in the same test, so a win against a strong field counts for more. The average tested tire gets 70, the best 100; with only one or two tests a tire stays nearer 70. The discipline rows show % of the best tire in that test.
Owner reviews
0–100 from the owner reviews we found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates and scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70. With only a few reviews a tire stays near the average.

By owner reviews

55/100

From 33 owner reviews analysed, scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70.

Would buy again 54%
Dry
Overall dry
55
Corner stability
54.1
Dry traction
56.7
Steering response
53.4
Wet
Overall wet
57
Wet traction
56.4
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
55.5
Ice
54.9
Comfort
Overall comfort
58.8
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
54.9
Handling
Overall handling
52.7

Own these tires? Write a review →

By road tests

13/100

Scaled across every tested tire: the average gets 70, the best 100.

By discipline: % of the best tire in each test.

Dry Braking
60%
Dry Handling
60%
Subj. Dry Handling
60%
Wet Braking
33.3%
Wet Handling
33.3%
Straight Aquaplaning
33.3%
Curved Aquaplaning
33.3%
Side G-Force on Wet surface
33.3%
Inside Noise level
80%
Rolling Resistance
86.7%
Wear
100%

Michelin Latitude Tour HP specs & sizes

Prices vary by size, so each one links out separately.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 33 owner reviews found online.

The Michelin Latitude Tour HP presents a polarized user experience, often praised for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and longevity on specific premium vehicles. However, a significant portion of users report inconsistent tread life, premature sidewall cracking, and disappointing wet-weather performance, leading to a mixed consensus regarding its value proposition.

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry-weather handling and steering response
  • High durability and longevity for specific vehicle applications
  • Stable and predictable performance on highway driving

Cons

  • Premature sidewall cracking and deterioration
  • Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle models
  • Poor traction and predictability in wet or snowy conditions
  • High price point relative to performance longevity

Worth knowing

  • Users of the Land Rover Freelander reported significant mechanical issues and vibrations when replacing older Michelin Synchrone tires with the Latitude Tour HP, likely due to diameter differences.
  • Owners of premium SUVs like the Porsche Macan generally report high satisfaction with comfort and longevity, whereas owners of mid-market SUVs like the Ford Escape and Honda CR-V frequently report rapid tread wear.
  • Some users noted that the tire's performance is highly sensitive to vehicle suspension health, suggesting that perceived handling issues may be exacerbated by worn shock absorbers.

Reviews from our readers

Drivers who have these tires on their car, in their own words. We check every review before it goes live.

No reviews from our readers yet

Driving on the Michelin Latitude Tour HP? Tell other drivers how it grips, rides and wears.

Write a review
Overall rating
Rate what you have tried (optional)
Dry grip
Wet grip
Snow & ice
Handling
Ride comfort
Quietness
Treadwear
Would you buy them again? (optional)

At least 40 characters.

Leave it empty to post anonymously.

We read every review before it goes live. Your IP address is never shown; a scrambled form of it is kept for up to a year to stop spam.

2 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2017 ACE SUV Summer tire Test · 215/60 R17

11th of 11

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: ACE

2017 ADAC SUV Summer tire Test · 215/65 R16

14th of 15

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: ADAC

Michelin Latitude Tour HP compared

Compare any two

Other tires to consider

Ranked by our Relative score, weighed against how many reviews and tests stand behind it.

Top rated all-season tires

  1. Hankook iON FlexClimate

    11 owner reviews · 3 tests

    83 Check price on Amazon
  2. Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF 3

    1,080 owner reviews · 21 tests

    80 Check price on Amazon
  3. Continental AllSeasonContact 2

    3,275 owner reviews · 25 tests

    80 Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.