Tests – · 1 test Owners 73 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 32 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Dueler H/L Alenza Plus 72, Proxes ST 71.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 73 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 75 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 73
Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 72 (est.) | ≈ 74 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 77 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73
Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 64 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69
Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 74 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72
Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 72 | – |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 69
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 70 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 72 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 69.5 + 40% × 73.5 = 71
Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 71 |
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 71 |
| Dry | 73 | 72 |
| Wet | 73 | 75 |
| Snow | 69 | 66 |
| Comfort | 72 | 72 |
| Noise | 69 | – |
| Treadwear | 71 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
Proxes ST
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | B · Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 3 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | 19″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 800 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
Toyo Proxes ST
Too close to call: Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus and Toyo Proxes ST are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus is stronger on snow. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus scores 69 vs 66 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 69 vs 66 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology