Tests – · 1 test Owners 74 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 32 + 493 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber HTS60 leads, 76–73 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 74 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests – · 1 test Owners 80 · 493 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“We have 38k miles on our 24 cclb with those tires and about 1/3 of that towing our 5th wheel, the only time I have needed 4wd with the trailer attached was when I dropped the trailer's left side tires off the concrete pad into the sand on a campsite at the beach. Only other time I needed 4wd was when we got caught in a snowstorm when traveling empty. The tires have worn well and are reasonably quiet and ride decent. If you decide to swap them I would be willing to take them off your hands”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 72 (est.) | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 80 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 80.3 = 76
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 77 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 81 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 74
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 76.5 (est.) + 40% × 81.2 = 78
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 72 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 70
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 81 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 76.3 = 74
Grabber HTS60: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 80.6 = 77
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 83 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 69
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 83.2 = 73
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus or Grabber HTS60. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 70 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 83 |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 68% | 79% |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 69.5 + 40% × 76.3 = 72
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 82.9 = 77
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 71 | 78 |
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | General Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 76 |
| Dry | 74 | 76 |
| Wet | 74 | 78 |
| Snow | 70 | 72 |
| Comfort | 74 | 77 |
| Noise | 69 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 77 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
Grabber HTS60
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus finished ahead 0 times and General Grabber HTS60 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS60 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 68% | 79% | −10.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/13 | #2/13 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires · 215/60R17 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community opinion of the General Grabber HTS 60 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its low price, quiet road manners, and strong fuel and electric efficiency compared to all-terrain alternatives. While widely praised as an affordable highway tire capable of light towing, some users note concerns regarding winter grip, wet hydroplaning at half tread, and isolated balance or sidewall defect issues.
“Our '24 Expedition came with General Grabber HTS60's. Terrible tire! Right from the start they were out of balance, dealer was only able to rebalance 3 of them and determined that the right front was bad. They replaced them with Pirelli Scorpion AS plus 3's. I cannot believe how much better of a ride that these offered over the Generals. Ranked just behind the Michelins on Tire Rack. I know that are not available in your size, but just sharing my General Tire experience. My next choice in tire was to go with the Defenders.”
“I had a set on an F250 2wd I bought. They had half of the tread left. I personally didn't care for them at half of the tread remaining. Might have been different if I bought them new and got better acclimated to them. They liked to hydroplane in rain, and I decided to replace them with Kuhmo Road Ventures, becaure TR had them on sale for $115 each at the time. I didn't want to go into winter with the Generals. I love the Kuhmos and they've been good tires but a completely different tire. Let us know how you make out if you purchase them. I may need to buy a set of tires for another F250 that's used as a business truck and wouldn't mind a less expensive option.”
“If you're not going off-road, I'd suggest General Grabber HTS60. I just put 4 on my 2014 XLT SC 5.0 4x4 for $780 out the door from a local independent tire shop in Delaware. Those were on the truck when I got it, and this is the second set I've put on. Quiet, and good in wet and moderate snow. No issues with towing my boat, a 26 ft Leisurecat. Boat is about 6100 fully loaded.”
Based on 38 community posts
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | B · General Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 3 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | 10 - 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 800 A A | 620 - 680 A A - B |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
General Grabber HTS60
Narrow edge: General Grabber HTS60 — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
General Grabber HTS60 scores 78 vs 71 on handling.
General Grabber HTS60 scores 77 vs 72 on treadwear.
General Grabber HTS60 scores 78 vs 74 on wet.
General Grabber HTS60 scores 73 vs 69 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
General Grabber HTS60, 78 vs 74 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 76 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the snow score, within 3 points.
General Grabber HTS60, 73 vs 69 on our noise score.
General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 74 on our comfort score.
General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology