tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 26 + 186 owner reviews. How we score

DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads, 71–67 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · DynaPro A/TM RF10 or Dueler H/T 684 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6777

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +5
    74
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6875

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 67

    Snow

    Dueler H/T 684 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6562

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 67

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +4
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6775

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/T 684 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6873

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Dueler H/T 684 or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5975

    Dueler H/T 684: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62

    DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/T 684. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    DynaPro A/TM RF10 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDueler H/T 684DynaPro A/TM RF10
    Reviews found online6471
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Dueler H/T 684Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Relative Score 67 71
Dry 68 73
Wet 69 74
Snow 67 65
Comfort 68 72
Noise 67 70
Treadwear 62 71
Handling (owners) 64 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Dueler H/T 684

DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Dueler H/T 684

Pros

  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality on paved roads
  • Low noise levels during highway and city driving
  • Good dry-road grip and stable handling at normal speeds

Cons

  • Poor traction and slippery behavior in wet conditions
  • Rapid tread wear and disappointing overall durability
  • Inadequate off-road and mud performance
All owner themes in the Dueler H/T 684 review

Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
  • Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
  • Potential for increased fuel consumption
All owner themes in the DynaPro A/TM RF10 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
CategorySummerAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available229
Rim diameters16″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth9/32″13/32″
UTQG300 B B560 A B
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10

Narrow edge: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better treadwear, handling and dry. Where the Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 684
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dueler H/T 684 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/T 684 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/T 684 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Dueler H/T 684 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Dueler H/T 684 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/T 684 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Dueler H/T 684 or DynaPro A/TM RF10?

Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology