Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 9 + 164 owner reviews. How we score
Crugen HT51 is ahead, 65–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 55 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 164 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2024 Tire Rack Highway All Season Tyre Test (dry circle)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
Crugen HT51 +865Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 51 76 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57
Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.2 + 40% × 75.8 = 65
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
55
Wet
Crugen HT51 +1267Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 60 Reviews found online 50 78 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 55
Crugen HT51: 60% × 59.5 + 40% × 78 = 67
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
60
Snow
Dueler H/T 687 +1149Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 36 Reviews found online 52 70 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 60
Crugen HT51: 60% × 35.7 + 40% × 69.5 = 49
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
53
Comfort
Crugen HT51 +1770Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 45 70 Dueler H/T 687: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.2 = 53
Crugen HT51: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.4 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
59
Noise
Crugen HT51 +1372Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 49 79 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 59
Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 72
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/T 687 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
53
Treadwear
Crugen HT51 +1366Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 44 76 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 53
Crugen HT51: 60% × 58.4 + 40% × 76.4 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
48
Handling (owners)
Crugen HT51 +2674Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Crugen HT51 Reviews found online 48 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 | Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 65 |
| Dry | 57 | 65 |
| Wet | 55 | 67 |
| Snow | 60 | 49 |
| Comfort | 53 | 70 |
| Noise | 59 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 48 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Dueler H/T 687
Crugen HT51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dueler H/T 687
Pros
- Reliable and predictable handling on dry pavement
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage lifespan
- Good light off-road performance on dirt, sand, and minor tracks
Cons
- Poor wet braking performance and grip at higher speeds
- Inadequate traction in deep snow, ice, mud, or wet grass
- Noticeable road noise as the tire wears
Tire B Crugen HT51
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
- Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction
Cons
- Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
- Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
- Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 | B · Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 7 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 12.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 B A | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
Kumho Crugen HT51
Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better handling, comfort and noise. Pick the Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 if snow matters most to you. Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 74 vs 48 on handling.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 53 on comfort.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 72 vs 59 on noise.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 66 vs 53 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dueler H/T 687 or Crugen HT51?
Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/T 687 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 67 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/T 687 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 65 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dueler H/T 687 or Crugen HT51?
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687, 60 vs 49 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Dueler H/T 687 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 59 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/T 687 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dueler H/T 687 or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 66 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology