Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 vs Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 24 owner reviews. How we score
Road Venture APT KL51 is ahead, 69–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 24 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
Road Venture APT KL51 +1269Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 51 69 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
55
Wet
Road Venture APT KL51 +1570Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 50 70 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 55
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
60
Snow
Road Venture APT KL51 +565Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 52 61 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 60
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
53
Comfort
Road Venture APT KL51 +1770Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 45 70 Dueler H/T 687: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.2 = 53
Road Venture APT KL51: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.4 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
59
Noise
Road Venture APT KL51 +867Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 49 69 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 59
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 67
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/T 687 or Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
53
Treadwear
Road Venture APT KL51 +1770Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Road Venture APT KL51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 44 72 Dueler H/T 687: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 53
Road Venture APT KL51: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/T 687. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Road Venture APT KL51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
48
Handling (owners)
Road Venture APT KL51 +2169Why this score
Source Dueler H/T 687 Road Venture APT KL51 Reviews found online 48 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 | Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 69 |
| Dry | 57 | 69 |
| Wet | 55 | 70 |
| Snow | 60 | 65 |
| Comfort | 53 | 70 |
| Noise | 59 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 48 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Dueler H/T 687
Road Venture APT KL51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dueler H/T 687
Pros
- Reliable and predictable handling on dry pavement
- Impressive long-term durability and high mileage lifespan
- Good light off-road performance on dirt, sand, and minor tracks
Cons
- Poor wet braking performance and grip at higher speeds
- Inadequate traction in deep snow, ice, mud, or wet grass
- Noticeable road noise as the tire wears
Tire B Road Venture APT KL51
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability, with many users reporting tens of thousands of miles
- High-value pricing offering significant savings compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet and dry traction with dependable on-road handling and braking
Cons
- Mediocre performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
- Slightly increased rolling resistance leading to a minor reduction in fuel economy for some drivers
- Occasional complaints regarding sidewall aesthetics or soft feel in high summer temperatures
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 | B · Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 7 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 B A | 600 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51
Winner: Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Dueler H/T 687 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 69 vs 48 on handling.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 70 vs 53 on comfort.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 70 vs 53 on treadwear.
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51 scores 70 vs 55 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dueler H/T 687 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Which is better in the wet, Dueler H/T 687 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 70 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dueler H/T 687 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 69 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dueler H/T 687 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 65 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Dueler H/T 687 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 67 vs 59 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Dueler H/T 687 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 70 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dueler H/T 687 or Road Venture APT KL51?
Kumho Road Venture APT KL51, 70 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology