Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 8 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 vs General Grabber HTS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 990 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber HTS is ahead, 58–53
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 990 reviews
“Yeah Michelin's are out of my price range. Went to sears today to see about getting either the Falkens are another set of Grabber HTS's installed and apparently their online pricing leaves out a ~$25 shipping/handling charge they assess to each tire so I left.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
Grabber HTS +659Why this score
Source Ecopia EP100 Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 44 53 Ecopia EP100: 60% × 58.1 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 53
Grabber HTS: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 59
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP100. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
55
Wet
Grabber HTS +661Why this score
Source Ecopia EP100 Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 49 58 Ecopia EP100: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 55
Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 61
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP100. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison58Why this score
Source Ecopia EP100 Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online – 50 Grabber HTS: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58
No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
52
Comfort
Grabber HTS +456Why this score
Source Ecopia EP100 Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 44 49 Ecopia EP100: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 44.2 = 52
Grabber HTS: 40% × 65.4 (est.) + 60% × 48.9 = 56
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP100 or Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison62Why this score
Source Ecopia EP100 Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 56 Grabber HTS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 62
No road tests of noise for Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
Level54Why this score
Source Ecopia EP100 Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 46 46 Ecopia EP100: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.7 = 54
Grabber HTS: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.1 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP100. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
42
Handling (owners)
Grabber HTS +1254Why this score
Source Ecopia EP100 Grabber HTS Reviews found online 42 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 | General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 58 |
| Dry | 53 | 59 |
| Wet | 55 | 61 |
| Snow | – | 58 |
| Comfort | 52 | 56 |
| Noise | – | 62 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 42 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
53
/ 100
Ecopia EP100
58
/ 100
Grabber HTS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP100
Pros
- High fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
- Impressive tread life and durability for daily driving
- Smooth and quiet ride quality on motorways
Cons
- Poor handling and stability during cornering
- Excessive tire squeal at low speeds
- Soft sidewalls causing a 'wallowing' or 'squirming' sensation
Tire B Grabber HTS
Pros
- Smooth and quiet ride quality that improves vehicle feel
- Excellent value and affordable price point compared to competitors like Michelin
- Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Premature tread wear reported by several users failing to reach expected mileage
- Balancing difficulties and occasional out-of-round vibrations
- Decreased winter and wet traction performance as the tread wears down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Ecopia EP100
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
General Grabber HTS
Community opinion on the General Grabber HTS is largely favorable, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfortable highway cruising, wet traction, and affordable price point. The most prevalent complaints focus on faster-than-advertised treadwear and occasional squirm or handling instability in heavy-load applications. Several users also note that while it handles moderate conditions well, dedicated snow tires are preferable in severe winter weather.
f150forum.com
“I put new tires on my truck this week. Since i tow a camper i decided to go with the 10 ply "E" rated tires. Since i put them on i have set the air pressure in 5 degree increments from 40-60 however the truck handles like crap. It feels like all 4 tires are flat it sways around so much. When im on the interstate going 60mph or so if i switch lanes it feels like the truck is going to fish tail. Anyone experienced this? I have about 200 miles on the tires now. Could it be they are not worn in? Or are these tires just that sloppy feeling?”
r/HyundaiSantaFe
·8 upvotes ·2025-03-11
“New shoes - General Grabber HTS 60’s on 2009 Santa Fe 2nd owner in my family after my grandfather, 124k and going strong Read more”
explorerforum.com
·2012-12-29
“Yeah Michelin's are out of my price range. Went to sears today to see about getting either the Falkens are another set of Grabber HTS's installed and apparently their online pricing leaves out a ~$25 shipping/handling charge they assess to each tire so I left.”
Top themes
#treadwear and longevity#highway comfort and noise#wet and dry traction#budget and value#winter and snow capability#towing and load stability
Based on 50 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 | B · General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 9 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11 - 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
53
/ 100
Bridgestone Ecopia EP100
58
/ 100
General Grabber HTS
Winner: General Grabber HTS — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Ecopia EP100 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber HTS scores 54 vs 42 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber HTS scores 59 vs 53 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber HTS scores 61 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber HTS scores 56 vs 52 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP100
Tire B · General Grabber HTS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP100 or Grabber HTS?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP100 or Grabber HTS?
General Grabber HTS, 61 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP100 or Grabber HTS?
General Grabber HTS, 59 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP100 or Grabber HTS?
General Grabber HTS, 56 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP100 or Grabber HTS?
Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 54 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology