Tests – · 1 test Owners 74 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 32 + 990 owner reviews. How we score
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus is ahead, 73–58
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 74 · 32 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 990 reviews
“Yeah Michelin's are out of my price range. Went to sears today to see about getting either the Falkens are another set of Grabber HTS's installed and apparently their online pricing leaves out a ~$25 shipping/handling charge they assess to each tire so I left.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 72 (est.) | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 53 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 74
Grabber HTS: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 58
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 57 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 74
Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 61
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 49 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70
Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 58
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 48 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 76.3 = 74
Grabber HTS: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 48 = 55
No road tests of comfort for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 55 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 69
Grabber HTS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 62
No road tests of noise for Dueler H/L Alenza Plus or Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 70 | ≈ 59 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 46 |
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus: 60% × 69.5 + 40% × 76.3 = 72
Grabber HTS: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.1 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 71 | 53 |
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 58 |
| Dry | 74 | 58 |
| Wet | 74 | 61 |
| Snow | 70 | 58 |
| Comfort | 74 | 55 |
| Noise | 69 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
Grabber HTS
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community opinion on the General Grabber HTS is largely favorable, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfortable highway cruising, wet traction, and affordable price point. The most prevalent complaints focus on faster-than-advertised treadwear and occasional squirm or handling instability in heavy-load applications. Several users also note that while it handles moderate conditions well, dedicated snow tires are preferable in severe winter weather.
“New shoes - General Grabber HTS 60’s on 2009 Santa Fe 2nd owner in my family after my grandfather, 124k and going strong Read more”
“Well , I have them on my 2003 Chevy Silverado 4x4. Put them on at 42k and now at 52k they look like they are 1/2 gone!! Good riding tire , low noise, great in rain and snow ,even wear pattern ,( ran at 39lbs air pressure / 35 psi in winter) but they are gonna be "iffy" for this coming winter by the looks of them.....geeeeesh. I rotated them at 6 k miles too. Nope....I would not buy the HTS Grabbers again. BOB in PA.”
“I am a big fan of General tires in general in the moderate budget category... they are a great cost to benefit tire and part of Continental tires. The Grabber HTS 60 is a great tire... as long as you don't have to deal with winter conditions. An alternative I have seen people extremely happy with is the Nexen Roadian HTX2 or the Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S... but in my neck of the woods we don't usually use "3-season" tires (which is what all-season tires really are these days) very often, but really like all-weather tires or using all-seasons in conjunction with dedicated winter/snow tires.”
Based on 50 community posts
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus | B · General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 3 | 9 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | 11 - 13/32″ |
| UTQG | 800 A A | 640 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus
General Grabber HTS
Winner: Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus scores 74 vs 55 on comfort.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus scores 72 vs 54 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus scores 71 vs 53 on handling.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus scores 74 vs 58 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 74 vs 61 on our wet score.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 74 vs 58 on our dry score.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 70 vs 58 on our snow score.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 69 vs 62 on our noise score.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 74 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Plus, 72 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology