Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 910 + 990 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HT RH12 is ahead, 67–58
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 990 reviews
“and wrote a review about them, do a search. they ran extremely strong, cornered well, and screamed like a gurl around the corners. mileage did not seem to be any better than the "N" rated tires, but the price was much better.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 53 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69
Grabber HTS: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 58
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 70 (est.) | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 57 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 61
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 49 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.5 = 62
Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 58
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 48 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67
Grabber HTS: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 48 = 55
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 55 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 71
Grabber HTS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 62
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HT RH12 or Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 64 | ≈ 59 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 46 |
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 + 40% × 65.8 = 65
Grabber HTS: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.1 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Dynapro HT RH12 | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 67 | 53 |
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 58 |
| Dry | 69 | 58 |
| Wet | 69 | 61 |
| Snow | 62 | 58 |
| Comfort | 67 | 55 |
| Noise | 71 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Dynapro HT RH12
Grabber HTS
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally views the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 as a reliable, comfortable highway all-season tire that offers good value compared to premium alternatives. Users note that the tires are quiet, track straight, and provide solid wet and dry grip, making them a popular choice for trucks, SUVs, and daily commuting.
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
“4 new Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 now installed in the CRV. Fresh production date (0618) and now made in the US. Thread looks slightly different than the replaced ones. They are quiet, track straight, no balancing issues and have a nice grip. Ride is a bit jumpy, not too much. $550 OTD with a $50 rebate. Son is happy.”
Based on 8 community posts
Community opinion on the General Grabber HTS is largely favorable, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfortable highway cruising, wet traction, and affordable price point. The most prevalent complaints focus on faster-than-advertised treadwear and occasional squirm or handling instability in heavy-load applications. Several users also note that while it handles moderate conditions well, dedicated snow tires are preferable in severe winter weather.
“New shoes - General Grabber HTS 60’s on 2009 Santa Fe 2nd owner in my family after my grandfather, 124k and going strong Read more”
“Well , I have them on my 2003 Chevy Silverado 4x4. Put them on at 42k and now at 52k they look like they are 1/2 gone!! Good riding tire , low noise, great in rain and snow ,even wear pattern ,( ran at 39lbs air pressure / 35 psi in winter) but they are gonna be "iffy" for this coming winter by the looks of them.....geeeeesh. I rotated them at 6 k miles too. Nope....I would not buy the HTS Grabbers again. BOB in PA.”
“I am a big fan of General tires in general in the moderate budget category... they are a great cost to benefit tire and part of Continental tires. The Grabber HTS 60 is a great tire... as long as you don't have to deal with winter conditions. An alternative I have seen people extremely happy with is the Nexen Roadian HTX2 or the Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S... but in my neck of the woods we don't usually use "3-season" tires (which is what all-season tires really are these days) very often, but really like all-weather tires or using all-seasons in conjunction with dedicated winter/snow tires.”
Based on 50 community posts
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | B · General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 24 | 9 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 11 - 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 54 psi | 44 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
General Grabber HTS
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 67 vs 53 on handling.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 67 vs 55 on comfort.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 69 vs 58 on dry.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 65 vs 54 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 69 vs 61 on our wet score.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 69 vs 58 on our dry score.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 62 vs 58 on our snow score.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 71 vs 62 on our noise score.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 67 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 65 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology