Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 vs General Grabber HTS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 910 + 990 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HT RH12 is ahead, 67–58
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 990 reviews
“and wrote a review about them, do a search. they ran extremely strong, cornered well, and screamed like a gurl around the corners. mileage did not seem to be any better than the "N" rated tires, but the price was much better.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Dynapro HT RH12 +1059Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 70 53 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69
Grabber HTS: 60% × 61.9 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 59
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
69
Wet
Dynapro HT RH12 +861Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 69 58 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69
Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 61
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
62
Snow
Dynapro HT RH12 +458Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 56 50 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 62
Grabber HTS: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
68
Comfort
Dynapro HT RH12 +1256Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 67 49 Dynapro HT RH12: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 66.9 = 68
Grabber HTS: 40% × 65.4 (est.) + 60% × 48.9 = 56
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HT RH12 or Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Noise
Dynapro HT RH12 +962Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 77 56 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 71
Grabber HTS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 62
No road tests of noise for Dynapro HT RH12 or Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Dynapro HT RH12 +1154Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Grabber HTS Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 64 ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 66 46 Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 65.6 = 65
Grabber HTS: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.1 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
67
Handling (owners)
Dynapro HT RH12 +1354Why this score
Source Dynapro HT RH12 Grabber HTS Reviews found online 67 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 58 |
| Dry | 69 | 59 |
| Wet | 69 | 61 |
| Snow | 62 | 58 |
| Comfort | 68 | 56 |
| Noise | 71 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Dynapro HT RH12
58
/ 100
Grabber HTS
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro HT RH12
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Grabber HTS
Pros
- Smooth and quiet ride quality that improves vehicle feel
- Excellent value and affordable price point compared to competitors like Michelin
- Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Premature tread wear reported by several users failing to reach expected mileage
- Balancing difficulties and occasional out-of-round vibrations
- Decreased winter and wet traction performance as the tread wears down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.
f150forum.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”
r/denverlist
·2025-12-09
“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
ridgelineownersclub.com
·2012-10-28
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Top themes
#pricing and affordability#quiet highway ride#wet and dry traction#tire comparisons#ride comfort and stability
Based on 8 community posts
Tire B
Positive
General Grabber HTS
Community opinion on the General Grabber HTS is largely favorable, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfortable highway cruising, wet traction, and affordable price point. The most prevalent complaints focus on faster-than-advertised treadwear and occasional squirm or handling instability in heavy-load applications. Several users also note that while it handles moderate conditions well, dedicated snow tires are preferable in severe winter weather.
f150forum.com
“I put new tires on my truck this week. Since i tow a camper i decided to go with the 10 ply "E" rated tires. Since i put them on i have set the air pressure in 5 degree increments from 40-60 however the truck handles like crap. It feels like all 4 tires are flat it sways around so much. When im on the interstate going 60mph or so if i switch lanes it feels like the truck is going to fish tail. Anyone experienced this? I have about 200 miles on the tires now. Could it be they are not worn in? Or are these tires just that sloppy feeling?”
r/HyundaiSantaFe
·8 upvotes ·2025-03-11
“New shoes - General Grabber HTS 60’s on 2009 Santa Fe 2nd owner in my family after my grandfather, 124k and going strong Read more”
explorerforum.com
·2012-12-29
“Yeah Michelin's are out of my price range. Went to sears today to see about getting either the Falkens are another set of Grabber HTS's installed and apparently their online pricing leaves out a ~$25 shipping/handling charge they assess to each tire so I left.”
Top themes
#treadwear and longevity#highway comfort and noise#wet and dry traction#budget and value#winter and snow capability#towing and load stability
Based on 50 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 | B · General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 24 | 9 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 11 - 13/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 54 psi | 44 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
58
/ 100
General Grabber HTS
Winner: Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 67 vs 54 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 68 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 65 vs 54 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 69 vs 59 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Tire B · General Grabber HTS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro HT RH12 or Grabber HTS?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro HT RH12 or Grabber HTS?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 69 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro HT RH12 or Grabber HTS?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 69 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro HT RH12 or Grabber HTS?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 62 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Dynapro HT RH12 or Grabber HTS?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 71 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro HT RH12 or Grabber HTS?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 68 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro HT RH12 or Grabber HTS?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 65 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology