Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 373 + 990 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber A/TX is ahead, 68–58
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 990 reviews
“and wrote a review about them, do a search. they ran extremely strong, cornered well, and screamed like a gurl around the corners. mileage did not seem to be any better than the "N" rated tires, but the price was much better.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 53 |
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68
Grabber HTS: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 73 (est.) | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 74 | 57 |
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73
Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 49 |
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68
Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 58
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 58 | 48 |
Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61
Grabber HTS: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 48.2 = 55
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 55 |
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64
Grabber HTS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62
No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 59 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 46 |
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70
Grabber HTS: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.3 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 59 | 54 |
| Category | General Grabber A/TX | General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 58 |
| Dry | 68 | 58 |
| Wet | 73 | 61 |
| Snow | 68 | 58 |
| Comfort | 61 | 55 |
| Noise | 64 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Grabber A/TX
Grabber HTS
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
“Thoughts on the “General Grabber A/TX” Tire? I’m thinking about getting it in a 33” SL rated 275/70r18. This tire comes in at 46Lbs which is super light. $915ish for 4! It’s the only 33”, snow rated, All Terrain, C/SL load range I could find. All the other 33”s are E rated coming in around 60lbs.”
“We finally go out first snow storm of winter. We have 8” of fresh snow on the ground, and below that a half an inch of ice (it rained first then snowed). Initial impressions of the General Grabber A/Tx is good. Way quieter than stock tires on the highway, and good traction on snow and ice.”
“Not sure where those ratings are from but all the ratings I have seen on the tire have been on par with other at tires. all 4 cost me 765 installed. My traction in NEPA has been excellent in the snow and wet.”
Based on 37 community posts
Community opinion on the General Grabber HTS is largely favorable, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfortable highway cruising, wet traction, and affordable price point. The most prevalent complaints focus on faster-than-advertised treadwear and occasional squirm or handling instability in heavy-load applications. Several users also note that while it handles moderate conditions well, dedicated snow tires are preferable in severe winter weather.
“I honestly think the Grabber HTS tires are weak to punctures Just spent $320 at Firestone I was not expecting to pay after only 5400 miles. The stock Grabber HTS tires are supposedly good for up to 50,000 miles IIRC. I barely made it 10% on one of them. This wasn’t the first time the tire picked up a small screw either. First time I got lucky and Discount Tire extracted it without needing repair because it didn’t make it deep into the tread. But last week I wasn’t lucky. Passenger front tire picked up a screw and sure enough, it went in. And it was only about 1.5” from the sidewall so they wouldn’t repair it. I went to Firestone and picked up a Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra. Not a “great” tire but at least I have a road hazard warranty, something the General Grabber tires don’t have. I’m sure someone will chime in about having zero issues after a million miles with their Grabber HTS but honestly, I haven’t had a legit puncture since 2007 and at that time I was poor so my car always had recycled/used/mismatched tires. I also noticed the tires on my Lightning ALWAYS have gravel and small rocks wedged in between the treads even though the truck is on city streets mainly. I never see that on my other cars.”
“Well , I have them on my 2003 Chevy Silverado 4x4. Put them on at 42k and now at 52k they look like they are 1/2 gone!! Good riding tire , low noise, great in rain and snow ,even wear pattern ,( ran at 39lbs air pressure / 35 psi in winter) but they are gonna be "iffy" for this coming winter by the looks of them.....geeeeesh. I rotated them at 6 k miles too. Nope....I would not buy the HTS Grabbers again. BOB in PA.”
“General Grabbers I found a guy on marketplace who bought some general grabber HTS for his truck and they didn’t fit so he’s selling them. They’re 11/32 tread life and he’ll take $350 for them. They’re my size but I’ve never heard of the brand. I have a 4Runner in Florida so no snow but is this a good deal for that brand? Read more”
Based on 50 community posts
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/TX | B · General Grabber HTS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 44 | 9 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 14 - 17/32″ | 11 - 13/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A - B | 640 A B |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 44 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 6 | 6 |
General Grabber A/TX
General Grabber HTS
Winner: General Grabber A/TX — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
General Grabber A/TX scores 70 vs 54 on treadwear.
General Grabber A/TX scores 73 vs 61 on wet.
General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 58 on dry.
General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 58 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
General Grabber A/TX, 73 vs 61 on our wet score.
General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 58 on our dry score.
General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 58 on our snow score.
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 62 on the noise score, within 3 points.
General Grabber A/TX, 61 vs 55 on our comfort score.
General Grabber A/TX, 70 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology