Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber A/TX vs General Grabber HTS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 373 + 990 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber A/TX is ahead, 68–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber A/TX
Tire AGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

General Grabber HTS
Tire BGeneral

Grabber HTS

All-Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 990 reviews

“and wrote a review about them, do a search. they ran extremely strong, cornered well, and screamed like a gurl around the corners. mileage did not seem to be any better than the "N" rated tires, but the price was much better.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Grabber A/TX +10
    58
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6853

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Grabber A/TX +12
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7457

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 68

    Snow

    Grabber A/TX +10
    58
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6749

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Grabber A/TX +6
    55
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5848

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61

    Grabber HTS: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 48.2 = 55

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 64

    Noise

    Grabber A/TX +2
    62
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6055

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Grabber A/TX +16
    54
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online7246

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.3 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 59

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber A/TX +5
    54
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXGrabber HTS
    Reviews found online5954
Scores at a glance
General Grabber A/TX vs General Grabber HTS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber A/TXGeneral Grabber HTS
Relative Score 68 58
Dry 68 58
Wet 73 61
Snow 68 58
Comfort 61 55
Noise 64 62
Treadwear 70 54
Handling (owners) 59 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber A/TX

± 7

Grabber HTS

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

Tire B Grabber HTS

Pros

  • Smooth and quiet ride quality that improves vehicle feel
  • Excellent value and affordable price point compared to competitors like Michelin
  • Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Premature tread wear reported by several users failing to reach expected mileage
  • Balancing difficulties and occasional out-of-round vibrations
  • Decreased winter and wet traction performance as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Grabber HTS review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Tire B

General Grabber HTS

Positive

Community opinion on the General Grabber HTS is largely favorable, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfortable highway cruising, wet traction, and affordable price point. The most prevalent complaints focus on faster-than-advertised treadwear and occasional squirm or handling instability in heavy-load applications. Several users also note that while it handles moderate conditions well, dedicated snow tires are preferable in severe winter weather.

r/F150Lightning ·3 upvotes ·2023-05-28

“I honestly think the Grabber HTS tires are weak to punctures Just spent $320 at Firestone I was not expecting to pay after only 5400 miles. The stock Grabber HTS tires are supposedly good for up to 50,000 miles IIRC. I barely made it 10% on one of them. This wasn’t the first time the tire picked up a small screw either. First time I got lucky and Discount Tire extracted it without needing repair because it didn’t make it deep into the tread. But last week I wasn’t lucky. Passenger front tire picked up a screw and sure enough, it went in. And it was only about 1.5” from the sidewall so they wouldn’t repair it. I went to Firestone and picked up a Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra. Not a “great” tire but at least I have a road hazard warranty, something the General Grabber tires don’t have. I’m sure someone will chime in about having zero issues after a million miles with their Grabber HTS but honestly, I haven’t had a legit puncture since 2007 and at that time I was poor so my car always had recycled/used/mismatched tires. I also noticed the tires on my Lightning ALWAYS have gravel and small rocks wedged in between the treads even though the truck is on city streets mainly. I never see that on my other cars.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2011-05-14

“Well , I have them on my 2003 Chevy Silverado 4x4. Put them on at 42k and now at 52k they look like they are 1/2 gone!! Good riding tire , low noise, great in rain and snow ,even wear pattern ,( ran at 39lbs air pressure / 35 psi in winter) but they are gonna be "iffy" for this coming winter by the looks of them.....geeeeesh. I rotated them at 6 k miles too. Nope....I would not buy the HTS Grabbers again. BOB in PA.”

r/tires ·4 upvotes ·2024-12-04

“General Grabbers I found a guy on marketplace who bought some general grabber HTS for his truck and they didn’t fit so he’s selling them. They’re 11/32 tread life and he’ll take $350 for them. They’re my size but I’ve never heard of the brand. I have a 4Runner in Florida so no snow but is this a good deal for that brand? Read more”

Top themes
#treadwear and longevity#highway comfort and noise#wet and dry traction#budget and value#winter and snow capability#towing and load stability

Based on 50 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber A/TX B · General Grabber HTS
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available449
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth14 - 17/32″11 - 13/32″
UTQG640 A A - B640 A B
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White LetteringBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure35 - 80 psi44 - 80 psi
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber A/TX

General Grabber HTS

Winner: General Grabber A/TX — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber A/TX scores 70 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber A/TX scores 73 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 58 on snow.

Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · General Grabber HTS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS?

General Grabber A/TX, 73 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS?

General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 58 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS?

General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 62 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS?

General Grabber A/TX, 61 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or Grabber HTS?

General Grabber A/TX, 70 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology