Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 75 reviews
Best test result: #4 of 16 in 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tyre Test (overall ranking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 vs Continental PremiumContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 77–58
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 82 · 42 tests Owners 73 · 2,346 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (overall ranking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
PremiumContact 6 +2582Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 86 Reviews found online 51 76 -
61
Wet
PremiumContact 6 +2283Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 87 Reviews found online 58 78 -
50
Snow
PremiumContact 6 +2373Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online 36 76 -
61
Comfort
PremiumContact 6 +1677Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 82 Reviews found online 54 71 -
62
Noise
Ecopia EP150 +1052Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 39 Reviews found online 54 71 -
58
Treadwear
PremiumContact 6 +1876Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – 84 Reviews found online 52 65 -
55
Handling
PremiumContact 6 +2075Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online 55 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 | Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 77 |
| Dry | 57 | 82 |
| Wet | 61 | 83 |
| Snow | 50 | 73 |
| Comfort | 61 | 77 |
| Noise | 62 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 76 |
| Handling | 55 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
58
/ 100
Ecopia EP150
77
/ 100
PremiumContact 6
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ecopia EP150 | PremiumContact 6 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/16 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tyre Test | #2/50 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP150
Pros
- High level of ride comfort and low-speed smoothness
- Generally durable construction capable of handling potholes
- Satisfactory dry-road handling for casual, daily driving
Cons
- Frequently cited as dangerous or unpredictable in wet conditions
- Noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature failure
Tire B PremiumContact 6
Pros
- Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
- Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
- High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence
Cons
- Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
- Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
- Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Continental PremiumContact 6
Community feedback for the Continental Premium Contact 6 is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its strong wet and dry grip, safety, and braking performance. Some users note softer sidewalls compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires and express concerns regarding premium pricing or wear rates. Overall, it is viewed as a capable, high-performing summer tire that balances comfort and traction effectively.
cliotrophy.co.uk
·2023-01-23
“I had the conti PC6 on my old F56 JCW running 300bhp/324lb-ft. 17" 215/45 Found them great In the wet, although the sidewalls were rather soggy compared to the previous Michelin Supersport, which admittedly are more of a UHP tyre”
r/nzev
·1 upvote ·2026-06-29
“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”
z4-forum.com
·2022-09-26
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
Top themes
#wet weather grip#braking and safety#sidewall stiffness and comfort#tread wear and longevity#price and value comparison#road noise levels
Based on 16 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 | B · Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 17″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 B B | 280 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
58
/ 100
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
77
/ 100
Continental PremiumContact 6
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better dry, snow and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 82 vs 57 on dry.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 73 vs 50 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 83 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 75 vs 55 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
Tire B · Continental PremiumContact 6
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.